Appeals to the Privy Council
Report No. 11_1733_00

Torrey v Mumford

Rhode Island 

 

Case Name Short

Torrey v Mumford

 
Case Name Long

Joseph Torrey v George Mumford

 
 

Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series

view_APC

APC Citation 

v.3 [293] p.402 – 20 December 1733 – entry 1

 
PC Register Citation 

George II v.3 (21 July 1732 – 18 July 1734) p.281, 489, 504: PC 2/92/281, 489, 504

view  

APC Citation 

v.3 [293] p.402–404 – 16 July 1734 – entry 2

 
PC Register Citation 

George II v.3 (21 July 1732 – 18 July 1734) p.527–529: PC 2/92/527–529

view  

APC Citation 

v.3 [293] p.404 – 18 July 1733 recte 1734 – entry 3

 
PC Register Citation 

George II v.3 (21 July 1732 – 18 July 1734) p.537–538: PC 2/92/537–538

view  

Colonial Courts

Inferior Court of Common Pleas – last Tuesday in June 1732

Superior Court – first Tuesday of September 1732

Superior Court – Newport – last Tuesday in March 1733

Participants

Bundy, James

Hull, John

Miles, Rev. Mr. Samuel, Presbyterian minister

Mumford, George

Smith, John, surveyor

Torrey, Joseph, Presbyterian minister, of South Kingstown in King’s County

Description

Land (trespass and ejectment) called the Petaquamsent (Petaquamset) purchase

Disposition

Reversed

Notes

Related to other Privy Council appeals:

    MacSparran v Mumford – Report No. 11_1725_00 (APC, v.3 [85] p.118)

    MacSparran v Hassard – Report No. 11_1736_00 (APC, v.3 [390] p.518)

All of these Privy Council appeals concern a dispute about glebe land and have overlapping parties. There is an extensive discussion of this dispute in Bilder, Salamanders and Sons of God, ch. 6.

Multiple spellings are given for the surname of the Presbyterian minister – Miles in Torrey v Mumford; Nyles in MacSparran v Hassard; Myles in Chalmers, Opinions of Eminent Lawyers, 1:9.

On the action of ‘trespass and ejectment’ involved here, see Additional Research.

References in Smith, Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations

Table of Cases (Torrey v Mumford)

Additional Sources

The entire dispute produced something of a pamphlet war: A brief representation of the case depending between the Rev. Dr. Mc’Sparran, plaintiff, and the Rev. Mr. Torrey, defendant, relating to the ministry land at Narraganset [Torrey, Brief Representation]; A brief representation of the case depending between the Rev. Dr. Mc’Sparran, plaintiff, and the Rev. Mr. Torrey, defendant, relating to the ministerial land in Narraganset in a letter from a gentleman at Newport to his friend in Boston [A.B., Brief Representation]; An answer to a printed letter said to be wrote from a gentleman in Newport to his friend in Boston Aug. 27; pretending to find fault with a brief representation of the case between Dr. McSparran plaintiff and Mr. Torrey defendant, relating to the ministry land in South Kingstown, Narragansett, which was dated July 1739 [Prince, Brief Representation].

See the detailed index in Manross, Fulham Papers. He summarizes enlightening correspondence and documentation about this case, which is reproduced on Reel 5 of Lambeth Palace Library, Fulham Papers. Of special note is “Dr. MacSparran’s narrative of the lawsuit concerning the glebe land at Narragansett in New England” in manuscript.


DOCUMENTATION

Printed Cases

Not found

Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew

Not found