Appeals to the Privy Council |
Report No. 11_1724_00 |
|
Rhode Island |
Case Name Short |
Cranston v Jekyll Jekyll v Cranston |
Case Name Long |
Samuel Cranston v John Jekyll John Jekyll v Samuel Cranston |
Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series |
APC Citation | v.3 [73] p.88 – 22 August 1724 – entry 1 |
PC Register Citation | George I v.4 (1 June 1722 – 25 August 1724) p.617: PC 2/88/617 |
APC Citation | v.3 [73] p.88 – 2 December 1724 – entry 2 |
PC Register Citation | George I v.5 (September 1724 – May 1727) p.19: PC 2/89/19 |
APC Citation | v.3 [73] p.88 – 20 July 1725 – entry 3 |
PC Register Citation | George I v.5 (September 1724 – May 1727) p.92, 103–104: PC 2/89/92, 103–104 |
APC Citation | v.3 [73] p.88 – 4 November 1725 – entry 4 |
PC Register Citation | George I v.5 (September 1724 – May 1727) p.122: PC 2/89/122 |
APC Citation | v.3 [73] p.88 – 16 January 1727 – entry 5 |
PC Register Citation | George I v.5 (September 1724 – May 1727) p.297: PC 2/89/297 |
Colonial Courts |
Vice Admiralty Court at Boston |
Participants |
Cranston, Samuel, Governor Hyam, Thomas, merchant, of London (attorney or agent for the owners, freighters, and insurers of the ship Porto Prince) Jekyll, John, Collector of the Customs |
Vessels |
Porto Prince aka Elpierto del Principe (ship) |
Description |
Condemnation |
Disposition |
The appeal and cross-appeal are admitted, but the outcome of the hearing is not stated. |
Notes |
Smith (p.186) notes that the register indicates in error that an appeal had already been granted to the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty; in fact it was to the High Court of Admiralty. However, given uncertainties about the jurisdiction of the Vice Admiralty Court, the appellant felt it “more proper to appeal to the King in Council.” |
References in Smith, Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations |
Table of Cases (Cranston v Jekyll) |
|
DOCUMENTATION |
Printed Cases |
Not found |
Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew |
Not found |