| Appeals to the Privy Council |
| Report No. 08_1692_00 |
|
New York |
| Case Name Short |
Mauritz v Philips |
Not a ‘true’ appeal. |
| Case Name Long |
Jacob Mauritz v Frederick Philips |
Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series |
| APC Citation | v.2 [444] p.208 – 17 March 1692 – entry 1 | ||
| CSP Citation | VIII no. 2128 |
| PC Register Citation | William III v.2 (3 September 1690 – 29 September 1692) p.350: PC 2/74/350 |
| APC Citation | v.2 [444] p.208 – 12 May 1692 – entry 2 | ||
| CSP Citation | VIII no. 2226 |
| PC Register Citation | William III v.2 (3 September 1690 – 29 September 1692) p.398: PC 2/74/398 |
| APC Citation | v.2 [444] p.208 – 18 May 1693 – entry 3 |
| PC Register Citation | William III v.3 (1 October 1692 – 29 November 1694) p.156: PC 2/75/156 |
Colonial Courts |
|
Proceedings in colonial court unclear |
Participants |
|
Mauritz, Jacob Philips (Flypse), Frederick, esquire |
Vessels |
|
Francis and Thomas, aka St. Peter (ship) |
Description |
Disposition of the Francis and Thomas |
Disposition |
Not stated in Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series |
Notes |
|
Not strictly an appeal but a petition of Jacob Mauritz, referred to the Lords of Trade and Plantations, claiming ownership of the vessel. See the various entries in the CSP for details. Mauritz claims to have been commissioned as a privateer by the rebel Jacob Leisler, for whom see Bayard v Rex (08_1702_02), Notes. |
|
|
DOCUMENTATION |
Printed Cases |
Not found |
Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew |
Not found |