Appeals to the Privy Council from the
Caribbean and Canadian Colonies
Report No. JAM_1759_03

Molesworth v Fearon

Peters v Bourke

Jamaica 

 

Case Name Long

Thomas Peters (later also Thomas Hercey Barritt and Thomas Biggs) v John Bourke, et al.

 
Case Name Long

Sir John Molesworth and Thomas Peters v Thomas Fearon

 
 

Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series

view_APC

APC Citation  

v.4 [385] p.413–414 (11 April 1759 – 26 July 1765)

 
  PC Register Citation

George II v.17 (1 Jan. 1758 – 21 May 1759) p.471: PC 2/106/471

view

  PC Register Citation

George II v.18 (2 May 1759 – 10 July 1760) p.131–132, 493: PC 2/107/131–132, 493

view

  PC Register Citation

George III v.1 (25 Oct. 1760 – 31 Dec. 1761) p.187: PC 2/108/187

view

  PC Register Citation

George III v.2 (1 Jan. 1762 – 30 April 1763) p.176–187, 202: PC 2/109/176–187, 202

view

  PC Register Citation

George III v.4 (1 Oct. 1764 – 27 Aug. 1766) p.169, 298–299, 305: PC 2/111/169–170, 298–299, 305

view

 

Colonial Courts

 
 

Chancery – 27 May and 21 Aug. 1758 (Peters v Bourke)

 
 

Chancery – 15 Nov. 1759 (Molesworth v Fearon)

 

Participants

Barritt, Elizabeth

 

Barritt, Nicholas, later deceased (father of Thomas Hercey)

 

Barritt, Thomas Hercey, appellant (son of Nicholas)

 

Biggs, Thomas, appellant

 

Bourke (Burke), John, respondent

 

Bourke (Burke), Nicholas

 

Byndloss, Matthew

 

Fearon, Hon. Thomas, respondent (father of Thomas Peters Fearon)

 

Fearon, Thomas Peters, deceased (son of Thomas)

 

Flaherty, John

 

Ford, Mr. ___ (attorney for defendants)

 

Goostrey, Mr. [Thomas] (attorney for Thomas Fearon)

 

Molesworth, Sir John, baronet, of Pencarrow in Cornwall, appellant

 

Peters, ___ (attorney for John Molesworth)

 

Peters, Thomas, appellant

 

Thomson, Duncan, surveyor

 

Warnes (Worms), Edward, surveyor

 

Welch, Mr. [?Richard] (attorney for plaintiffs)

 

Wilson, Edmund, of New Court in the Temple (attorney for John Bourke and John Flaherty)

 

Description

Concerning land.

Disposition

Decrees of 1758 reversed.

Notes

John Bourke’s name is spelled ‘Burke’ in the printed case filed on his behalf. The fact that Yorke and Forrester represent the respondent in Molesworth v Fearon and the appellant in Peters v Bourke suggests, as is in fact the case, that the issues involved in the two cases are quite different despite the overlapping parties.

 

References in Smith, Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations

Table of Cases (Peters v Bourke)


DOCUMENTATION

Printed Cases

Appellant’s case

Case of the appellant (Sir John Molesworth and Thomas Peters v Thomas Fearon)
Case of the appellant (Thomas Peters v John Bourke )

Counsel

Flr. Norton; C. Ambler (Molesworth v Fearon)
C. Yorke; Al. Forrester (Peters v Bourke)

 
Library

British Library: (Hardwicke Papers) Additional Manuscripts 36218 f.154r–156v (Molesworth v Fearon. Printed/manuscript date on dorse 6 April 1762; manuscript notes only on dorse.)

view

Library

British Library: (Hardwicke Papers) Additional Manuscripts 36218 f.161r–163v (Peters v Bourke. Printed date on dorse 6 April 1762; includes manuscript notes.)

view

Library

British Library: (Hardwicke Papers) Additional Manuscripts 36219 f.261r–263v (Peters v Bourke (as above). Printed date on dorse 6 April 1765. Note on dorse: “The Respondents on the former Hearing took an objection that Barritt & Biggs were not made Partys, they gave it upon the Merits, so the Lords ordered us to amend our Appeal, We have done it & made them Partys, & brung a Summons upon the Royal Exchange. To be heard 16. July 1765. Mr Yorke Mr Forrester – 10 Gu. /s/ Eyre.” Manuscript notes and underlining throughout.)

view

Library

British Library: (Hardwicke Papers) Additional Manuscripts 36219 f.264r–266v (Peters v Bourke (as above). Printed date on dorse 6 April 1765. Note on dorse: “(July 1764) This Cause was Part heard last Year when the respondents insisting upon their Objection for Want of Partys, the Lords ordered it to stand over with Liberty to amend our Appeal by adding Biggs & Barrett Partys – This has been done & a Summons brung upon the Royal Exchange – The Merits were in a Manner given up to us last Hearing, so we ?suspicion there will be little or no Opposition to us - Mr Eyre will send a Brief before with the two others that Mr Yorke ?has lately settled. As to the Lordships it has been long since heard as a Plantation Case [a line and a half deleted] Ex parte.” No other manuscript notes or underlining..)

view

Respondent’s case

Case of the respondent (Sir John Molesworth and Thomas Peters v Thomas Fearon)
Case of the respondent (Thomas Peters v John Burke)

Counsel

C. Yorke; Al. Forrester (Molesworth v Fearon)
T. Sewell; E. Willes (Peters v Burke)

 
Library

British Library: (Hardwicke Papers) Additional Manuscripts 36218 f.157r–160v (Molesworth v Fearon. Printed date on dorse 6 April 1762; manuscript notes only on dorse.)

view

Library

British Library: (Hardwicke Papers) Additional Manuscripts 36218 f.164r–165v (Peters v Burke. Printed date on dorse 6 April 1762. Note on dorse “Mr. Atty Genrl.” No other notes or underlinings.)

view

Library

British Library: (Hardwicke Papers) Additional Manuscripts 36219 f.267r–268v (Peters v Burke (as above). Printed date on dorse 6 April 1762. No manuscript notes or underlining.)

view

 

Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew

 
TNA Document Committee report (Peters and Molesworth v Bourke) – 18 July 1765 (PC 1/51/56) view_Document
Notes about
Document
Referenced in APC v.6 [667] p.403.

view_APC