| Bio-Bibliographical Guide to Medieval and Early Modern Jurists |
|
Click on image for more information |
|
Report No. a463 |
Quaestiones Pragenses II |
late 12th c.? |
|
| Alternative Names |
Biography/Description |
|
Follow immediately after the Pragenses I. According to Fransen, they represent a different form of redaction in that they omit for the most part any reference to the underlying case and concentrate on the questio itself. But again, they share much of their material with the Bambergenses III. French in origin. |
|
|
Entry by: KP rev AL 2015 |
Text(s) |
| No. 1 | Quaestiones Pragenses II. |
Text(s) – Manuscripts |
| No. 1 |
Quaestiones Pragenses II. |
| Manuscript | Praha, Univ. Knihovna XIV. E. 31, fol. 43rb–45ra |
Text(s) – Modern Editions |
| No. 1 |
Quaestiones Pragenses II. |
| Modern Editions |
Analysis by G. Fransen in Traditio, 12 (1956) 566–69, 581–92. |
Literature |
|
G. Fransen, ‘Les “Questiones” des canonistes: Essai de dépouillement et de classement I’, Traditio , 12 (1956) 566–92. |
|
S. Kuttner, ‘Bernardus Compostellanus Antiquus’, Traditio, 1 (1943) 321 n.6. |
