All texts. This list is derived from Soetermeer in DHJF, as are many of the notes.

Repetitiones. At least 120 repetitiones on the Digestum vetus survive, and 94 on the Code. The list of repetitions on the Digestum vetus in Meijers (1959) 128–132 can be completed with with the aid of more recent publications by Bezemer, Waelkens, Soetermeer, and Feenstra/Duynstee. Those on the Code are listed by Bezemer in Pierre de Belleperche.

Lectura Codicis. The work itself is known only in manuscript, but it has been analyzed by Bezemer.

Lectura Digesti novi. The work is preserved partially in manuscript. For printed fragments, see below.

Lectura Institutionum. The title suggest that it is commentary on the entire Institutes. It is not. That on the title De actionibus is important. For the rest, see Manuscripts and Early Editions. The early editions seem quite full, and probably are composites of P’s work and that of Jacobus de Ravanis, and perhaps others.

Brocarda / Distinctiones / Quaestiones / Notae. Bartolus and Baldus cite many brocarda of P. For the printings, see Early Editions. The manuscripts contain various items labelled as ‘brocarda’, ‘distinctiones’, ‘quaestiones’, or ‘notae’.

Letctura Digesti veteris / Lectura Infortiati. Both Albercus de Rosate and Baldus cite these. Perhaps they are referring to repetitiones.

Consilia. Discussed in Bezemer (1985).

Tractatus de verborum significatione. Although this work is occasionally attributed to P., it is highly unlikely that he wrote it. See Maffei (1998).

Summa feudorum. Not to be confused with the work of a similar title, sometimes attributed to Jacobus de Ravanis, and discussed in the entry on him. Although there are printed editions that attribute this work to P., no known manuscript does so, nor does any modern scholar. Seckel attributed it to Johannes Fasolus (Pisanus), an attribution that Maffei, more recently, accepts. Meijers attributed it to Petrus de Accon (later reworked by Martinus Sillimani). According to MS San Lorenzo de El Escorial e.I.10, fol. 83, the author is Arnaldus Arpadella, who seems to have been a colleague of Martinus Sillimani. See further the entry on Martinus Sillimani..

Uncertain. Category created to accommodate one manuscript, the contents of which are uncertain, but to which attention should be called.

All texts.

Dolezalek, Manuscripta Juridica list 123 manuscripts with attributions to P. 83 of them are Additiones to various books of the Justinianic corpus. We list 38 of the remaining 41 here, where P. is listed as the sole author, even if the attribution is queried. While some of the attributions are probably mistaken, they tend to confirm the attributions in Texts, and to confirm the misattributions noted in Early Editions.

Repetitiones.

t186txt01Bruxelles/Brussel, Bibl. Royale 5680-5682, fol. 154r (-159r) (On C.2.3.13, C.2.3.28.)

t186txt01Modena, Bibl. Estense a.M.8.19 – lat.1161, fol. 102–117 (On C.7.47. Incipit: Continuatio huius. Explicit: ff. de duobus l. Nemo. Qualiter autem sententia feratur non dixit dominus Petrus, quia scolares noluerint eum audire, nisi quod dixit ‘Et debet ferri super eo quod petitum est, in l. In fundum, ff. communi diuidundo’ ...expositionem L.ri. (sic) noluerunt audire, ne sit falsa diffinitio scholaris in qua dicitur: ‘Est animal irrationalis contra propriam semper pugnans utilitatem’)

t186txt01Paris, BN lat. 4488, fol. 217v (on D.41.2.6.1)

t186txt01Paris, BN lat. 4488, fol. 261r (on D.41.2.6.1)

t186txt01Paris, BN lat. 4488, fol. 219v (On D.42.1.14. Dolezalek notes: ‘Petrus de Bellapertica; reportiert von Guilielmus de Brandestone’.)

t186txt01Karlsruhe, Badische Landesbibl. Aug. VIII, fol. 1-2 (Labelled as ‘repetitio de appellationibus’. Dolezalek notes: ‘oder Fragment aus einer Lectura’.)

t186txt01Madrid, BN 573, fol. 76rb-106vb (Dolezalek notes: ‘auf fol.99r zu D.2.8.11. Analyse bei Meijers, Etudes III, p. 128-132’. Rubric: Incipiunt leges repetitae per dominum Petrum de Bellapertica. Incipits: Habuistis unum exemplum de [and then:] iure gentis; (Praecedit lemma:) Ut vim, etcetera. Explicit: (anscheinend bricht der Text unvollständig ab:) plures dilationes. Sic appellatoria et appellationis prosecutoria reus.)

Paris, BN lat. 4458, fol. 115 ss

t186txt01Paris, BN lat. 4488, fol. 139 (-166) (Dolezalek notes: mixed P., Jacobus de Ravanis, and others.)

t186txt01Cambridge, Peterhouse Coll. 34, fol. 154va-(170vb) (Dolezalek notes: ‘Zuschreibung nach Meijers III, 102, zweimal durch Siglum bestätigt: nämlich auf fol. 163ra und fol. 166va. Erhalten sind hier folgende Repetitiones: C.1.26(29)2, C.3.36.24, const. ”Cordi”, C.2.1.3, C.3.22.1, C.4.38.5, C.5.62.12, (Insertion: D.22.6.2), C.3.32.22, C.8.26(27)1, C.7.45.9; C.6.37.1’.)

t186txt01Cambridge, Peterhouse Coll. 34, fol. 259ra-261va (C.6.42.14, C.6.26.9, C.6.37.23)

t186txt01Douai, BM 648 (Dolezalek notes: ‘zu verschiedenen Leges, unter anderem zu C.1.26.2’.)

t186txt01Città del Vaticano, BAV Borgh. lat. 277, fol. 1ra-95rb (Dolezalek notes: ‘Es sind 81 Texte, einzeln analysiert bei Meijers, Études III, p. 128-132’. Incipit: Questio est tediosa et textus (D.5.3.7 'Si quis libertatem'). Explicit: sic infra quod iussu per totum. Colophon: Repetitiones super ff. veteri. Es folgt ein Index repetitionum (fol. 95rb-va).)

t186txt01Cambridge, Peterhouse Coll. 34, fol. (154va)-170vb (D.22.6.2, D.46.8.22.4, D.1.7.22, D.1.5.15)

Lectura Codicis.

t186Txt02Cambridge, Peterhouse Coll. 34, fol. 1ra-154rb (C.1 through C.4. Incipit: Signo uenerabilis crucis [and then:] preposito, prout decet. Explicit: consuetudine seruatur.)

t186Txt02Cambridge, Peterhouse Coll. 34, fol. 171ra-258vb (C.6 through C.9. Incipit: Rubricam istam ad. Explicit: que dixi possunt(?) uobis(?) apparet(?). Colophon: Explicit ... domini Petri Bellapertica super Codice.)

t186Txt02Firenze, Bibl. Laurenz. Santa Croce Plut. 6 sin. 6 (Dolezalek notes: ‘Buch 5 fehlt, Buch 9 ist unvollständig. Hinter Buch 8 sind viele Repetitiones eingeschoben’. Incipit: Signo venerabilis crucis [and then:] preposito prout decet et moris est, ut J. de officio pretoris africe l. In nomine domini. Explicit: ff. de regulis iuris l. Res iudicata.)

t186Txt02Napoli, Bibl. Statale C.F.III,1 (C.1.1. Dolezalek attributes to both Petrus de Bellapertica and Jacobus de Ravanis.)

t186Txt02Paris, BN lat. 15424, fol. (5)-22r (C.1.1.1; C.6.37.1; C.3.1.16. Incipit: Signo crucis uenerabilis.)

t186Txt02San Marino, Huntington Libr. El.7.H.9, fol. 1-49, 63-64 (fragmentary)

Lectura Digesti novi.

t186Txt03Douai, BM 648 (D. 45.1)

t186Txt03Milano, Bibl. Ambrosiana (scaffali 'supra'), D.86 sup. (D.45.1. Dolezalek notes: ‘anonym, saec. XIV. Eng geschrieben und teils abgeschabt, daher schwer zu lesen. Zitiert Petrus de Bellapertica. Nicht übereinstimmend mit der Lectura von Bartolus de Saxoferrato’.)

Lectura Institutionum.

t186Txt04Città del Vaticano, BAV Ross. lat. 584, fol. (1va-70vb) (Dolezlek notes: ‘hier geschrieben als Additiones zu den Institutiones’.)

t186Txt04Paris, BN lat. 15424, fol. 5-(22r) (JI.4.6 [De actionibus]. Dolezalek queries the attribution.)

t186Txt04Basel, Universitätsbibl. C.II.23, fol. 33r-88v (JI.4.6 [De actionibus]. Dolezalek notes: ‘mit Randbemerkungen verschiedener Hände’.)

t186Txt04Bruxelles/Brussel, Bibl. Royale 5680-5682, fol. 159r-221 (JI.4.6 [De actionibus]. Dolezalek notes: ‘Petrus de Bellapertica; reportiert durch Guilielmus de Brandestone’.)

t186Txt04Paris, BN lat. 4488, fol. 2 (-66) (JI.4.6 [De actionibus])

t186Txt04Paris, BN lat. 14612, fol. 103r-162r (JI.4.6 [De actionibus]. Dolezalek notes: ‘reportiert durch den Engländer Guilielmus de Brandestone’. There was a Bradenstone Priory in Wilts. William remains to be identified.)

t186Txt04Paris, BN lat. 15424, fol. 22v-(64) (JI.4.6 [De actionibus])

Brocarda / Distinctiones / Quaestiones / Notae.

t186Txt05Kaliningrad, Universitätsbibl. 169 (Brocarda. Dolezalek queries whether this manuscript may now be in Toruń, Biblioteka Uniwersytecka.)

t186Txt05Leipzig, Universitätsbibl. 992, fol. 141ra (Distinctio. A later addition. Incipit: Ut hec materia plane liqueat, de reuocatione (MS: renouatione) testamenti distinguo. Explicit: sed fisco applicabitur, ut de hiis que ut indignis l. Cum quidam. (Siglum:) p.)

t186Txt05Kaliningrad, Universitätsbibl. 169 (Distinctio ‘de revocatione testamentorum’, ad C.6.23.30. Dolezalek queries the attribution and whether this manuscript may now be in Toruń, Biblioteka Uniwersytecka.)

t186Txt05London, BL Royal 11.D.i, fol. 1r-3v (flyleaves) (Labelled ‘Lectura: excerpta’. Dollezalek dates to saec. XIV and notes 'Dazu nicht uninteressante Quaestiones und Distinctiones, die noch auf eine Analyse warten’.)

t186Txt05Vendôme, BM 94, flyleaf rb (Labelled as a ‘nota’. Incipit: (?) super incidenti uel emergenti sic pronunciandum. Explicit: et sic intelligo omnes leges ad istas questiones facientes. Colophon: Petrus de bela.)

t186Txt05Leipzig, Universitätsbibl. Hänel 15, fol. 75r-75v (Labelled as a ‘quaestio’. Rubric: Disputatio cuiusdam questionis per dominum Petrum de Bellapertica. Incipit: Questio talis est. Quidam uir ha..tus(?) laicus commisit homicidium et accusatus, citatus et condempnatus professionem assumpsit. Explicit: ff. de arbitris l. Non distinguemus § Sacerdotio. Laus deo.)

t186Txt05Frankfurt am Main, Stadt- und Universitätsbibl. Barthol. 9, fol. 276v (Labelled as ‘quaestiones’. Dolezalek notes: ‘zwei Texte, nicht aufgeführt in der Liste bei Meijers, Etudes III 128-132’.)

t186Txt05Reims, BM 709, fol. 126ra-rb (Labelled as ‘quaestiones’. Dolezalek notes: ‘quattuor. Geschrieben durch eine jüngere, halbkursive Hand. Der Charakter des Textes ähnelt den gedruckten Quaestiones’. Incipits: (ad C. de iureiur. l. ii) Si quesistis(?) si consuetudo sit emissa(?); (ad Auth. de testibus § Et licet [Nov.90.2]) Pone sic: Actor litigat contra reum. Reus petit sibi libellum; (ad C. de iuris et facti ignorantia, l. i.) Si queras quando exceptiones (sehr ähnlich wie Nr. 28 der gedruckten Quaestiones, dort auf fol. 8rb); (ad legem 'Causa que sic':) Iuxta autem istam constitutionem.)

Uncertain.

t186txt10Paris, Bibl. Cassation [Bellapertica, Lecturae], fol. 1-411v (Dolezalek reports that there is a microfilm of this manuscript at the Institut de recherche et d’histoire des textes. Not in CCfr. The IHRT lists what is probably this item under ‘Cour de Cassation’, but is otherwise not helpful. The court’s online catalogue, which is otherwise quite good, does not seem to list it.)

All texts.

This list is derived, for the most part, from Soetermeer in DHJF.

Repetitiones.

Petri de Bella Pertica Auree ac singularissime . . . repetitiones XLVIII. Paris: Galliotus Du Pre, 1515 (online). Despite the title, this item contains 49 repetitions, 13 on the Digestum vetus and 36 on the Code. Fol. 244r–246r have a quaestio ‘de conseutudine in qualibet ecclesia collegiata’.

Repetitiones seu commentarii iuris civilis. Lyon: Servanius Lugduni a Porta, 1553. P’s repetitiones can be found in vols. 1, 7, and 8 of this massive collection. They are most easily located with the aid of Ascheri and Brizio, Index. Soetermeer says that nothing is found here that is not in Paris 1515.

Petri A Bella Pertica . . . Commentaria In Digestvm Novvm: Explicationes Singvlares, Sive . . . Repetitiones Eivsdem Petri A Bella Pertica, In Aliqvot Leges Digesti Veteris, et Codicis Iustiniani. Frankfurt: Feyrabend, 1571, 7–151 (second pagination) (online). Soetermeer says that this item is a reprint of Paris 1515. The entire work was reprinted in Opera iuridica rariora 10 (1968).

Lectura Codicis.

Petri de Bella Perthica Juris vtriusq[ue] professoris subtilissimi Lectura i[n]signis et fecunda super Prima [et secunda] parte Codicis domini Justiniani. Paris: Petrus Gromorsus, 1519 (online). Despite the clear indication in the edition, this is not the work of P. but of Jacobus de Ravanis. The misattribution seems to have been deliberate. It was noted by Charles Du Moulin (Soetermeer, in DHJF, s.n. Revigny, Jacques de) and by many scholars since then, e.g. H. Kiefner (1963). The work was reprinted in Opera iuridica rariora 1 (1967) with the correct attribution, but in Frankfurt in the following year with the wrong one.

Lectura Digesti novi.

Petri A Bella Pertica . . . Commentaria In Digestvm Novvm. Frankfurt: Feyrabend, 1571 (online). Reprinted in Opera iuridica rariora 10 (1968). There is no reason to doubt the attribution, but Soetermeer suggests that it is incomplete. The title page and the contents mention commentaries on D.43, 44, 45, 46, and 49. Dolezalek’s list of the manuscripts does not promise anything more.

Lectura Institutionum.

Lectura aurea excellentissimi viri . . . Petri de Bella Pertica super librum Institutionum. Paris: N. Vaultier, ca. 1513 (online). Soetermeer reports Paris editions of 1512 and 1514. This is the only one in WorldCat, and it is undated.

Petri De Bella Pertica Ivreconsulti Gallorum clarissimi, in libros Institutionum Diui Iustiniani Sacratiss. principis, Co[m]mentarij longè acutissimi. Lyon: Heredes Simonis Vincentii, 1536 (online). Reprinted in Opera iuridica rariora 7 (1972).

Brocarda / Distinctiones / Quaestiones / Notae.

Questiones auree et singulares famosissimi utriusque juris monarche domini Petri de bella pertica. Excerpte super quolibet titulo iuris cesarei. cum eiusdem quindecim notabilibus necnon tractatu frugifero de feudis. Lyon: Simon Vincentius, 1517 (online). Reprinted in Opera iurdica rariora 11 (1970) under the general title Quaestiones et Distinctiones. Contains 547 quaestiones and 15 notabilia. For the De feudis, see below.

Summa feudorum.

Questiones auree . . . necnon tractatu frugifero de feudis. Lyon: Simon Vincentius, 1517, fol. 161v–180v (online). Reprinted in Opera iurdica rariora 11 (1970) under the general title Quaestiones et Distinctiones. The attribution of the De feudis to P. is seriously doubted; see Texts.

Petri de Bella Pertica . . . De feudis tractatus novus. Köln: Johannes Birckmann, 1565 (online). For the attribution, see previous note.

(This list is somewhat selective and is derived, for the most part, from Soetermeer in DHJF.)

Y. Mausen, ‘Pierre de Belleperche’, in Great Christian Jurists in French History, O. Deschamps and R. Domingo, ed. (Cambridge 2019) 85–96.

F. Soetermeer, ‘Pierre de Belleperche’, in DHJF (2015) 81–83.

A. Lefebvre-Teillard, ‘Une repetitio de Pierre de Belleperche sur la ”loi” Quod Nerva [D. 16,3,32]’, in Meditationes de iure et historia: Essays in Honour of Laurens Winkel, R. van den Bergh and others, ed. (Pretoria 2014) 536–545. (Reference in Mausen, ‘Pierre’.)

A. Lefebvre-Teillard, ‘“Si minor delinquit ex culpa”: à propos d’une controverse soulevée par Jacques de Revigny’, TRG, 79 (2011) 203–218, esp. 213–214.

M. Duynstee, L’enseignement du droit civil à l'université d’Orléans du début de la guerre de Cent ans (1337) au siège de la ville (1428) (Studien zur europäischen Rechtsgeschichte 253; Frankfurt 2010).

K. Bezemer, ‘The Infrastructure of the Early Ius Commune: The Formation of Regulae, or its Failure’, in The Creation of the Ius Commune: From Casus to Regula, J. Cairns and P. du Plessis, ed. (Edinburgh Studies in Law 7; Edinburgh 2010) 57–75, esp. 66–70.

A. Tardif, ‘Recherches sur Pierre de Belleperche, Portrait d’un chancelier discret’, TRG, 77 (2009) 385–421.

A. Tardif, ‘Pierre de Belleperche, juriste et conseiller de Philippe le Bel’, Bulletin de la Société d‘émulation du Bourbonnais, 74 (2008) 209–242.

K. Bezemer, ‘Pierre de Belleperche: An Early Attempt to Make Public Law a Separate Branch of Legal Science?’, in Science politique et droit public dans les facultés de droit européennes (XIIIe-XVIIIe siècle), J. Krynen and M. Stolleis, ed. (Studien zur europäischen Rechtsgeschichte 229; Frankfurt 2008) 44–45.

S. Lepsius, ‘“Iurisdictio” und “districtus” bei Jacques de Revigny. Die Auseinandersetzung der französischen Legistik des 13. Jahrhunderts mit einem staufischen Herrschaftskonzept’, in Die Anfänge des offentlichen Rechts, 2. Von Friedrich Barbarossa zu Friedrich II, G. Dilcher and D. Quaglioni, ed. (Annali dell’Istituto storico italo-germanico in Trento. Contributi 21; Bologna-Berlin 2008, 2008) 247–276, esp. 267–270. (This item also has an Italian title Gli inizi del diritto pubblico.)

H. Lange and M. Kriechbaum, Kommentatoren (2007) 546–567. (Items with dates after 2005 are derived from BBKL.)

K. Bezemer, Pierre de Belleperche. Portrait of a Legal Puritain (Studien zur europäischen Rechtsgeschichte 194; Frankfurt 2005).

G. Guyon, ‘Pierre de Belleperche’, in Juristas universales (2004) 1.480–483 (315–317 in PDF).

K. Bezemer, ‘Pierre de Belleperche and the disputatio’, in “Panta rei”. Studi dedicati a Manlio Bellomo, O. Condorelli, ed. (Roma 2004) 1.262–274.

F. Soetermeer, ‘Petrus de Bellapertica’, in BBKL (2003) 22, col. 1071–1078. (The online version, available by subscription, brings the detailed bibliography up to 2019.)

E. Cortese, ‘Controversiae medievali sul domino utile: Bartolo e il quidam doctor Aurelianis’, in Amicitiae pignus Studii in ricordo di Adriano Cavanna, A. Padoa Schioppa, G. di Renzo Villata, and G. Massetto, ed. (Milano 2003) 613–635.

P. Weimar, ‘Petrus de Bellapertica Juristen’, in Juristen. Ein biographisches Lexikon, M. Stolleis, ed. (2001) 493–494.

K. Bezemer, ‘A French Gentleman [Raoul d’Harcourt] in Italy or Bal masqué of the Ultramontani’, in Excerptiones iuris: Studies in Honour of André Gouron, B. Durand and L. Mayali, ed. (2000) 49–69.

K. Bezemer, ‘Ne res exeat de genere or How French Custom Was Introduced Into the ius commune’, RIDC (2000) 73–74, 79–81, 83–88, 96–101, 104–105, 114.

K. Bezemer, ‘Word for Word (or Not). On the track of the Orleans Sources of Cinus’ Lecture on the Code’, TRG, 68 (2000) 433–454.

E. Cortese, Le grande linee della storia giuridica medievale (Roma 2000) 374–375.

K. Bezemer, ‘The Law School at Orléans as School of Public Administration’, TRG, 66 (1998) 266–270, 275–277.

D. Maffei, ‘Riflessioni su Jacques de Revigny e Pierre de Belleperche lessiocografi’, in Life, Law and Letters: Historical Studies in Honour of Antonio García y García, P. Linehan, ed. (SG 28–29; Roma 1998) 605–612.

F. Soetermeer, ‘Doctor suus? Accurse et Jacques Balduin’, in Life, Law and Letters: Historical Studies in Honour of Antonio García y García, P. Linehan, ed. (SG 28–29; 1998) 804–814. Reprinted in: idem, Livres et juristes au Moyen Âge (Bibliotheca eruditorum 26; Goldbach 1999) XIV.

F. Soetermeer, ‘Due tradizioni testuali francesi dell’Apparatus Digesti Novi di Accursio’, RIDC, 8 (1997) 78, 92–93, 107, 108, 123–124. Reprinted in: idem Livres et juristes au Moyen Âge (Bibliotheca eruditorum 26; Goldbach 1999) XIII.

F. Soetermeer, ‘La carcerazione del copista’, RIDC, 6 (1995) 181–182. Reprinted in: idem, Livres et juristes au Moyen Âge (Bibliotheca eruditorum 26; Goldbach 1999) IX.

K. Bezemer, ‘French Customs in the Commentaries of Jacques de Revigny’, TRG, 62 (1994) 81–112.

R. Feenstra, ‘Fourteenth-century Orleans glosses in an Oxford manuscript of the Infortiatum: Gilles Bellemère as a Romanist’, Index: Intrenational Survey of Roman Law, 22 (1994) 481, 483, 486, 495f., 506. Reprinted in: idem, Legal Scholarship and Doctrines of Private Law, 13th–18th Centuries (Variorum collected studies CS 556; Aldershot 1996) I.

P. Weimar, ‘Pierre de Belleperche, jurist’, in LMA (1993) 6, col. 1962–1963. (Online by subscription.)

K. Bezemer, ‘Legal Remedies for Non-Roman Law in Medieval Doctrine. The condictio ex consuetudine and Similar Actions’, TRG, 60 (1992) 63–80.

R. Feenstra, ‘L’École de droit l’Orléans au treizième siècle et son royonnement dans l’Europe médiévale’, Revue d’Histoire des Facultés de Droit et de la Science Juridique, 13 (1992) 37–39, 41–42. Reprinted in: idem, Legal Scholarship and Doctrines of Private Law, 13th–18th Centuries (Variorum collected studies CS 556; Aldershot 1996).

R. Feenstra and M. Duynstee, ‘Un recueil de textes de l’École de droit d’Orléans dans la Huntington Library à San Marino (Cal.)’, TRG, 60 (1992) 93–100.

G. Giordanengo, ‘Studium Aurelianense. Les écoles et l’université de droit (XIIIe–XIVe siècles) d’après recherches récentes des historiens néerlandais’, Perspectives médievales, 18 (1992) 13, 20–21.

G. Giordanengo, ‘Les feudistes (XIIe–XIVe siècles)’, El dret comun, 2 (1992) 113–115.

K. Bezemer, ‘Les quaestiones disputatae dans les commentaires de Jacques de Revigny’, TRG, 58 (1990) 5–38.

F. Soetermeer, ‘L’ordre chronologique des apparatus d‘Accurse sur les libri ordinarii’, in Historia del derecho privado.Trabajos en homenaje a Ferran Valls i Taberner, M. Peláez, ed. (Barcelona 1989) 2867–2892, esp. 2872. Reprinted in: idem, Livres et juristes au Moyen-Âge (Bibliotheca eruditorum 26; Goldbach 1999) 247*–272* (addenda et corrigenda: 387*–391*, esp. 389*).

T. Schmidt, Der Bonifaz-Prozess. Verfahren der Papstanklage in der Zeit Bonfaz’ VIII und Clemens’ V (Forschungen zur kirchlichen Rechtsgeschichte und zum Kirchenrecht 19; Köln 1989) 69, 90–92.

K. Bezemer, Les répétitions de Jacques de Revigny. Recherches sur la répétition comme forme d’enseignement juridique et comme genre litéraire, suivies d’un inventaire des textes. Édition du texte, précédée de prolégomènes (Leiden 1987). (For references to P., see the index.)

M. Ascheri and E. Brizio, Index repetitionum iuris canonici et civilis (Siena 1985) 125–130.

R. Feenstra, ‘L‘enseignement du droit à Orléans. État des recherches menées depuis Meijers’, in Études néerlandaises de droit et d’histoire présentées à l’université d’Orléans pour le 750e anniversaire des enseignements juridiques, R. Feenstra and C. M. Ridderikhoff, ed. (Bulletin de la Société archéologique et historique de l’Orléanais, n.s. 9 [68]; Orléans 1985) 12–29. Reprinted in: idem, Le droit savant au moyen âge et sa vulgarisation (Variorum reprint CS236; London 1986) III.

F. Soetermeer, ‘Les fils d’Accurse et l’Ecole d’Orleans’, in Études néerlandaises (1985) 69–80. Reprinted in: idem, Livres et juristes au Moyen-Âge (Bibliotheca eruditorum 26; Goldbach 1999) II.

K. Bezemer, ‘Une consultation orléanaise pour l’ordre cistercien’, in Études néerlandaises (1985) 97, 99, 101, 106.

L. Waelkens, La théorie de la coutume chez Jacques de Revigny. Édition et analyse de sa répetition su la loi De quibus (D. 1. 3, 32) (Leiden 1984).

F. Soetermeer, ‘Recherches sur Franciscus Accursii. Ses Casus Digesti Novi et sa répetition sur le loi Cum pro eo (C. 7,47 un)’, TRG (1983) 3–49. Reprinted in: idem, Livres et juristes au Moyen Âge (Bibliotheca eruditorum 26; Goldbach 1999).

J. R. Strayer, The Reign of Philip the Fair (Princeton 1982).

K. Bezemer, ‘A repetitio by Jacques de Revigny on the Creations of the ius gentium’, TRG, 49 (1981) 287–321.

C. M. Ridderikhoff, Jean Pyrrhus d’Anglebermes. Rechtswetenschap en Humanisme aan de Universiteit van Orleans in het begin von de 16e eeuw (1981) 338–340.

D. Maffei, Giuristi medievali e falsificazioni editoriali del primo Cinquecento: Iacopo di Belviso in Provenza? (Ius commune. Sonderhefte 10; Frankfurt 1979) 4, 58–59, 75–80.

J. Favier, Philippe le Bel (Paris 1978; repr. 1998).

W. M. Gordon, ‘Cinus and Belleperche’, in Daube Noster. Essays in Legal History for David Daube, A. Watson, ed. (Edingurgh 1974) 105–117.

D. Maffei, ‘Qualche postilla alle richerche di E. M. Meijers’, TRG, 36 (1968) 387–400. Reprinted in: idem Studi di storia delle università e della letteratura giuridica (Bibliotheca eruditorum 1; Goldbach 1995) 89–102.

P. Weimar, ‘Die Erstausgabe de sogenannten Lectura Institutionum des Pierre de Belleperche’, TRG, 35 (1967) 284–290. Reprinted in: idem, Zur Renaissance der Rechtswissenschaft im Mittelatlter (Bibliotheca Eruditorum 8; Goldbach 1997).

H. Kiefner, ‘Zur gedruckten Codexlectura des Jacques de Revigny’, TRG, 31 (1963) 5–38.

D. Maffei, La Lectura super Digesto veteri di Cino da Pistoia. Studi sui mss. Savigny 22 e Urb. lat. 172 (Milano 1963) 33, 37, 49, 50.

P. Legendre, ‘E. M. Meijers et la romanistique médiévale. Réflexions sur une nouvelle édition’, TRG, 29 (1961) 331–342.

B. Paradisi, ‘La scuola di Orléans. Un epoca nuova del pensiero giuridico’, SDHI, 26 (1960) 349, 350, 361–62.

E. Meijers, ‘L’Université d’Orléans au XIIIe siècle’, in Études d’histoire du droit , R. Feenstra and H. Fischer, ed. (1959) 3.95–106, 141–146. (Soetermeer notes: ‘ajouts fondamentaux’.)

R. Feenstra, ‘L’histoire des fondations. À propos de quelques études récentes’, TRG, 24 (1956) 423–24, 429, 432. Reprinted in: idem, Le droit savant au moyen âge et sa vulgarisation (Variorum reprint CS236; London 1986) I.

F. Lajard, ‘Pierre de Belleperche, jurisconsulte’, in HLF (1869) 25.351–380 (online). (Soetermeer notes: ‘biographie très critique et toujours utile’.)

F. von Savigny, Geschichte 6.27–33 (online).