| Bio-Bibliographical Guide to Medieval and Early Modern Jurists |
|
Click on image for more information |
|
Report No. a548 |
Summa ‘Tria sunt per que religionis’ |
1170s |
|
| Alternative Names |
Biography/Description |
|
A fragmentary commentary on C.1 of the Decretum. According to Kuttner, it was influenced by Rufinus and therefore written in the late 1160s. Lenherr has propounded that the summa fragment is remarkable for its originality and has convincingly argued that belongs to the French school of decretists. It cites a decretal by Alexander III to the Archbishop of Rouen in 1170. Lenherr therefore dates it to the 1170s. |
|
|
Entry by: KP rev AL 2015 |
Text(s) |
| No. 1 | Summa ‘Tria sunt per que religionis’. |
Text(s) – Manuscripts |
| No. 1 |
Summa ‘Tria sunt per que religionis’. |
| Manuscript | München, BSB Clm 16084, fol. 34 |
Literature |
|
T. Lenherr, Die Exkommunikations– und Depositionsgewalt der Häretiker bei Gratian und den Dekretisten bis zur Glossa ordinaria des Johannes Teutonicus (Münchener Theologische Studien 3, Kan. Abt. 42; München 1987) 207–11. (On the provenance and dating, see 207 n57.) |
|
S. Kuttner, |
|
F. Gillmann, ‘Einteilung und System des Gratianischen Dekrets nach den alten Dekretglossatoren bis Johannes Teutonikus einschließlich. Unter besonderer Rücksicht auf Rudulph Sohm: Das altkatholische Kirchenrecht und das Dekret’, AKKR, 106 (1926) 549. |
|
H. Singer, ‘Beiträge zur Würdigung der Decretistenlitteratur’, AKKR, 67 (1893) 378. |
