| Appeals to the Privy Council |
 |
List of Images Held by the Ames Foudation |
This page provides links to images that the Ames Foundation has made from items in its possession, has made in libraries or archives that do not have a separate page for images, or has downloaded of items believed to be in the public domain. In the case of the last two, a note indicates the source of the image. The images are in some cases divided by page and in others contained in a single PDF document. In the former case, clicking on any of the page links below will bring you to an image of the page listed embedded in an HTML frame. You can navigate between the pages either by using the arrows at the top and bottom of the image frame or by returning to this page, which will remain in a separate tab or window. The images are large, so that the small print can be read. For the PDFs, clicking on the link below will bring you directly to the relevant PDF. You may download and use a single copy of the image only for purposes of private study, research, or teaching. Any other use requires the permission of the Ames Foundation and of the entity listed in the source note. Ames Foundation images are copyright © 2016–2018 by the Ames Foundation. They are provided for private, non-commercial, research, and teaching purposes only. |
|
Report No. ANT_1725_03 |
Chester v Paynter Chester v Gunthorp Byam v Gunthorp |
Antigua |
| Other Documents | This case and the points of law agreed upon on the appeal are reported sub nom. Chester v Painter, 2 P. Wms. 335–8, 24 Eng. Rep. 755–6 (PC 1725). |
| Library | Ames Foundation: (2 pages) (Source: English Reports – CommonLIIorg) |
Ames: 24 Eng. Rep. 755–756 |
| Other Documents | Summarized in 2 Eq. Cas. Abr. 313–14 pl. 21, 22 Eng. Rep. 266 (PC ?1721). |
| Library | Ames Foundation: (1 page) (Source: HeinOnline [available by subscription]. HeinOnline styles this case as Chester [Bishop of] v Painter, which is quite misleading. Eq. Cas. Abr. styles it simply as Chester and Painter. This entry attributes the case to Hilary 1721, though it cites as its source P. Wms., which has the correct year, but no term) |
Ames: 22 Eng. Rep. 266 |
| Other Documents | And in 2 Eq. Cas. Abr. 375 pl. 24, 22 Eng. Rep. 319 (PC 1725). |
| Library | Ames Foundation: (1 page) (Source: HeinOnline [available by subscription]. HeinOnline styles this case as Chester [Bishop of] v Painter, which is quite misleading. Eq. Cas. Abr. styles it simply as Chester and Painter. The entry attributes the case to Hilary 1725, citing as its source P. Wms., which has the same year, but no term) |
Ames: 22 Eng. Rep. 319 |
| Other Documents | And in 2 Eq. Cas. Abr. 560 pl. 6, 22 Eng. Rep. 472 (PC 1725). |
| Library | Ames Foundation: (1 page) (Source: HeinOnline [available by subscription]. HeinOnline styles this case as Chester [Bishop of] v Painter, which is quite misleading. Eq. Cas. Abr. styles it simply as Chester and Painter. The entry attributes the case to Hilary 1725, citing as its source P. Wms., which has the same year, but no term) |
Ames: 22 Eng. Rep. 472 |
| Other Documents | It is cited by the reporter in confirmation of the ruling in Laundry v Williams, 2 P. Wms. 478, 480, 24 Eng. Rep. 823, 824 (Ch. 1728). |
| Library | Ames Foundation: (2 pages) (Source: HeinOnline [available by subscription]) |
Ames: 24 Eng. Rep. 823–824 |