[001] than the king. And so if two claim to hold of the king by a service certain, one by a [002] smaller service and the other by a larger; his writ falls who holds by the smaller [003] service, because of the king's advantage. The writ also falls if one impetrates as to a [004] certain thing and a certain action, then withdraws himself and afterwards wishes [005] to sue with respect to the same in another proceeding. [Of exceptions against the [006] writ, some take1 their substance from time. Some writs are limited to certain definite [007] times, just as actions are, back of which they do not extend, any more than the action, [008] because of lack of proof, according as the action has been brought on the possession [009] or on the property, as the assise of novel disseisin, mortdancestor, the assise utrum, [010] a writ of entry or2 a writ of right, as above.] A writ also falls if one by his narratio made [011] in court departs from his writ, by going beyond the force and nature of the writ, as [012] where one is sued in a possessory cause on a writ of cosinage and the demandant in [013] his count makes mention of the right, or if he claims one thing verbally and another [014] by the writ, unless it so happens that when he says a different thing he says what [015] amounts to the same. Almost all the exceptions which lie for someone or against [016] someone may be included among the exceptions to the writ, for where the action is [017] determined the writ comes to an end, where the action falls the writ falls, and where [018] the action is postponed or suspended or changed, so is the writ. When several exceptions [019] lie against the writ, they may well be put forward, according to some, at different [020] times, but it will be within the judge's power to compel the tenant to put forward all [021] the available exceptions against the writ at one and the same time and on the same [022] day, and thus the way may be closed for putting forward further exceptions against [023] the writ. But when the tenant has put forward one, that not he but another holds the [024] entire thing claimed, and that has been determined, he will not return to a similar [025] exception later on, as will be explained more fully below.3 And note that when a writ [026] has fallen through defect or error, if a similar but corrected writ is impetrated the [027] action will be the same as before and the writ the same,4 though there is other parchment [028] and other ink. And therefore neither the narratio