-->

The Ames Foundation

THE RECORD BOOKS
OF THE MASSACHUSETTS BAY
SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE:
ca. 1690 – ca. 1780

Transcription of the volume for 1760–1762

Transcription of the volume of maritime cases, 1779–1783, 1788

The record books of the Massachusetts Superior Court of Judicature begin in the late 17th century and continue, virtually uninterrupted, until the creation of the court’s successor, the current Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in 1780.1 They are large-folio bound volumes, written for the most part in a quite legible 18th-century script. They seem to record all the business that came before the court. What they do record is recorded in considerable detail.

1 The maritime volume runs to 1783, with one set of entries from 1788. The change of name of the court is noted in the headings in it.

The books are in the custody of the current Supreme Judicial Court. Access to them is possible but difficult, and photographing them is particularly difficult because of their size. For this reason they have not been much used by legal historians, though they contain a mine of information for legal historians. In the 1970s, the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints in Utah microfilmed the records. Digital versions of these films are available on the website FamilySearch, but are difficult to use for legal-historical purposes.

With this in mind, and through the kindness of the Genealogical Society of Utah and FamilySearch, the Foundation obtained digital copies of these films. The Supreme Judicial Court gave us permission to publish them. The Foundation commissioned Digital Data Divide Ventures, Inc., to create baseline transcription of each volume. Professor Sally Hadden, of Western Michigan University and a director of the Foundation, has been supervising the team of research assistants who have been verifying the transcriptions, tandem-reading them to correct errors, and indexing them. Much work remains to be done, but we have reached the point where we can publish online a transcription of the volume that covers main business of the court in the years 1760–1762 and that which contains admiralty cases from 1779–1783, and 1788. Others will follow, as will a proper introduction and indexing.

The transcriptions strive to be diplomatic. Original spelling, capitalization, and punctuation have been retained, as have the original line breaks. Rather than trying to mimic the layout of the originals, we have indicated it with the following symbols as seen in this example:

Each new page begins with:
NP
Image 547-Right = The image number on the microfilm, and whether it is the left or right side of the image. We plan to hyperlink these to the images, but that has not yet been done.2
451 = The folio number if the clerk put it in.
[451r] = Our folio number.

In the text:
<< = The beginning of any marginalia.
>> = The end of any marginalia.
<_> = A wide underline that the clerk put in to separate entries.
[^ TEXT ^] = Text that is interlined.3
} = Bracketing so that any text following is flushed to the right.
TEXT = Text that is struck through.4
<TEXT> = Something that we have added.
[TEXT] = Something in the text that is questionable.
(TEXT) = Parentheses in the original text.
[-] One or more dashes to indicate, it would seem, that nothing belongs in the space so filled.
[x] One or more x’s or flourishes used by the clerk to indicate that nothing else should be inserted or was missing from the original record.
Carry-over words are flushed left; in the text they are normally flushed right.

2 The image numbers are sequential, but they contain a number of skips. Where the photographer duplicated an image this is indicated by <duplicates following> and <duplicates previous>. In a few places the skip in the image number is greater than one, where the photographer included material unrelated to SCJ.

3 Occasionally (e.g., 1760–1762, fol. 453r near end) an interlineation will stream out into the margin. If this happens, the line of text will not fit in the margins of the transcription but will carry over to the next physical line.

4 ‘vs.’ in case names seems regularly to have been struck through.

Each volume contains a manuscript table of cases, alphabetical by the first party’s surname. The tables were probably compiled when the volume was bound. References are to the folio numbers in the volume. They have not been checked for errors.

The volumes are arranged by formal sessions of the court in chronological order. The tables of contents found below and again with annotations at the beginning of the PDFs list those sessions. The sessions are also found in the right running head of the PDF. The left running head gives the name of the volume. Both running heads have the page numbers in the PDF. We do not recommend that these numbers be used for reference purposes, because they are likely to change. Better for reference purposes is the folio number despite the fact that it gives the user of the reference more to search through.

Search engines will eventually be provided for the texts, though that will not happen until the all the transcriptions are done. In the meantime the PDF’s search engine (if you download the text) or that of the browser can be used, though the irregular spelling is something of a challenge. Similarly, we plan to incorporate links to the images themselves. That is also a longer term project. In the meantime, if there is a particular image that you want to see, email us. We will do our best.

Thanks are owing, in particular, to the Colonial Society of Massachusetts, which is providing some of the funding that makes this project possible and which shares with us the rights in the project. The Burnham-Macmillan Endowment Fund of Western Michigan University provided us with a key grant early in the process that helped us to get going.

The following also deserve our thanks: Lynn Turner, Dan Peay, and Jeff Svare of the Utah Genealogical Society and Family Search were instrumental in getting us the digital copies of the microfilms. Professor Ryan Rowberry of the Georgia State College of Law put us in touch with the Society. The former president of the Foundation, Professor Annette Gordon-Reed, has been continually supportive. Jamie Moncrief has helped us with photographic and metadata work

Workers on the project include: Alex Bowman, Eric Dobberteen, Richard Drooyan, Anita Dymant, Tre Michael Goodhue, Nathan Grimes, Patricia Gunter, Nora Hafez, Alisa Heskin, Arthur D. Kamya, Hannah Renee Keller, Robert Olsen, Kylie Owens, Austin Setter, Joshua Douglas Simon, Jane E. Ward, Emily Yurkus. To all of these we are most grateful.

CONTENTS 1760–1762

Session   Folio
Charlestown, 29 January 1760 ................................................ 1r
Boston, 19 February 1760 ................................................ 10r
Plimouth, 29 April 1760................................................32r
Barnstable, 6 May 1760................................................42r
Ipswich, 24 June 1760................................................52r
York, 1 July 1760................................................65r
Cambridge, 5 August 1760................................................79r
Boston, 19 August 1760................................................93r
Worcester, 16 September 1760................................................114r
Springfield, 23 September 1760................................................124r
Taunton, 15 October 1760................................................144r
Salem, 21 October 1760................................................154r
Charlestown, 27 January 1761................................................161r
Boston, 17 February 1761................................................166v
Plymouth, 12 May 1761................................................181v
Barnstable, 7 May 1761................................................188r
Ipswich, 9 June 1761................................................192r
York, 16 June 1761................................................198v
Falmouth, 23 June 1761................................................208r
Cambridge, 4 August 1761................................................210v
Boston, 18 August 1761................................................221r
Worcester, 15 September 1761................................................239v
Springfield, 22 September 1761................................................250r
Taunton, 18 October 1761................................................264r
Salem, 24 October 1761................................................272r
Charlestown, 26 January 1762................................................278r
Boston, 16 February 1762................................................288r
Plimouth, 27 April 1762................................................323r
Barnstable, 4 May 1762................................................330r
Ipswich, 8 June 1762................................................337r
York, 15 June 1762................................................348r
Falmouth, 22 June 1762................................................361r
Cambridge, 3 August 1762................................................369r
Boston, 17 August 1762................................................380r
Worcester, 21 September 1762................................................402r
Springfield, 28 September 1762................................................416r
Taunton, 12 October 1762................................................437r
Salem, 19 October 1762................................................452r

MARITIME CASES 1779–1783, 1788

Session   Folio
Ipswich, 15 June 1779................................................1r
Boston, 31 August 1779................................................16r
Boston, 15 February 1780................................................26r
York, 27 June 1780................................................31r
Boston, 29 August 1780................................................32r
Cambridge, 14 November 1780................................................35r
Concord, 10 April 1781................................................38r
Ipswich, 18 June 1781................................................42r
Falmouth, 3 July 1781................................................45r
Boston, 28 August 1781................................................47r
Taunton, 16 October 1781................................................52r
Cambridge, 30 October 1781................................................52v
Salem, 6 November 1781................................................53r
Boston, 19 February 1782................................................56r
Barnstable, 16 May 1782................................................61r
York, 25 June 1782................................................62v
Falmouth, 2 July 1782................................................64r
Boston, 19 November 1782................................................66v
Cambridge, 10 December 1782................................................69r
Boston, 18 February 1783................................................71r
Concord, 8 April 1783................................................73r
Plymouth, 20 May 1783................................................76v
Ipswich, 17 June 1783................................................82v
Boston, 26 August 1783................................................84v
Taunton, 25 November 1783................................................90v
Concord, 13 April 1783................................................95v
Taunton, 23 October 1788 ................................................100r

 

Charles Donahue, Jr.

 

This page last updated: 07/06/25.
Contact Rosemary Spang with comments.
URL: http://amesfoundation.law.harvard.edu/MassSCJ/index.html.
Copyright © 1999–2025 The Ames Foundation. All rights reserved.