Appeals to the Privy Council
Report No. STC_1770_00

Wharton v St. John

Gardiner v Fahie

Gardiner v St. John

St. Christopher 

 

Case Name Long

William Wharton, Joseph King, William Feuilleteau, Aretas Akers, Christopher Mardenbrough and Henry Seaton v James St. John and Henry Berkeley

Case Name Long

John Gardiner v John Fahie

Case Name Long

John Gardiner v James St. John

 

Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series

view_APC

APC Citation  

v.5 [160] p.277–280 (14 Sept. 1770 – 30 June 1775)

 
PC Register Citation  

George III v.7 (May 1769 – Dec. 1770) p.485–486, 627, 605, 626–627: PC 2/114/485–486, 627, 605, 626–627

view  

  PC Register Note

(The first two references are those for Wharton v St. John, the second two for Gardiner v Fahie.)

 
PC Register Citation  

George III v.9 (Jan. 1772 – Dec. 1772) p.132–136, 171–173, 266, 292, 315: PC 2/116/132–136, 171–173, 266, 292, 315

view  

PC Register Citation  

George III v.11 (May 1774 – May 1775) p.476: PC 2/118/476

view  

PC Register Citation  

George III v.12 (June 1775 – May 1776) p.31–32, 56–57: PC 2/119/31–32, 56–57

view  

PC Register Citation  

George III v.13 (June 1776 – May 1777) p.140, 428–429: PC 2/120/140, 428–429

view  

Colonial Courts

Assembly and Judges of St. Christopher – 1770

Court of King's Bench and Common Pleas – 15 March 1773

Court of Errors – 13 May 1774

Participants

Akers, Aretas, esquire, appellant

Bennett, Henry, assistant justice

Berkeley, Henry, esquire, deputy provost marshall, respondent

Bryan, Anthony, deceased

Douglas, Alexander, assistant justice

Fahie, John, speaker of the Assembly, respondent

Feuilleteau, William, esquire, appellant

Gardiner, John, appellant

Greathead, Craister, esquire, chief justice

King, Joseph, esquire, appellant

Mardenbrough, Christoper, esquire, appellant

Phillips, Francis, assistant justice

Seaton, Henry, esquire, appellant

St. John, James, sergeant at arms, respondent

Wharton, William, esquire, appellant

Description

Wrongful imprisonment by order of the Assembly of St. Christopher.

Disposition

Appeal of Wharton et al. and Gardiner’s first appeal dismissed but with instructions to the courts of St. Christopher to reinstate their cases. Gardiner’s second appeal admitted. Outcome not stated in the Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series.

Notes

Not indexed as an appeal.


DOCUMENTATION

Printed Cases

Not found

Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew

Not found