[001] anticipated by the summons, as was said above. But we must see by what writ, [002] because, when this is done by the ignorance of the summoners who testify that they [003] made lawful summons, the justices are not at fault, nor the demandant. The better [004] way, so it seems, is for the tenant to say that he was wrongfully disseised, [wrongfully] [005] though with a judgment, because by a wrongful judgment.1 Then, when the [006] demandant who recovered answers to the assise, he may vouch the king's court to [007] warranty, which was deceived, by which the process and the judgment may be [008] revoked.
How a default may be cured by the service of the lord king.
[010] Before judgment a default may be cured in many ways, just as the judgment, when [011] it has been given, may be revoked. First of all, by the service of the lord king, if he [012] is so in his service that he cannot send or come, for the service of the lord king [013] ought not to be prejudicial to anyone,2 nor so to his advantage that it is harmful to [014] another.3 Writs of warrant for the king's service are drawn in this form, for the kinds [015] of default are various. [If] the default is4 before the itinerant justices, sometimes for [016] the common summons, sometimes for a plea of land,5 let the writs be drawn in this [017] form.
Writs which excuse because of the service of the lord king.
[019] The king to his beloved and faithful justices itinerant in such a county, greeting. [020] Know that such a one was in our service on such a day at such a place, so that he [021] could not be before you in your eyre on such a day for the common summons. [022] Therefore we order you not to put him, or permit him to be put, in default because [023] of the common or general summons made before you of knights and free tenants [024] and others in your eyre, because as to that we warrant his absence to him. Or in [025] another way: that such a one was in our service etc. (as above) so that he could not [026] appear before you in the plea pending between him and such a one with respect to [027] so much land with the appurtenances in such a vill. Therefore we order you not to [028] put him in default because of his absence on that day before you, nor to allow him [029] to lose in any way, because we warrant that day to him, And just as a day is warranted, [030] a term may be warranted, for good reason, that is, from such a day to such [031] a day. Thus engagement in a more important matter excuses a man and protects [032] him from the penalty for contumacy,6 as does ill health. For he does not suffer the [033] penalty for contumacy whom ill health or engagement in a more important matter [034] protects.7 As a warrant by the king's