[001] if they wish, or appear. If they appear they may well receive another day, and so [002] from day to day until it is clear as to the rising of those essoined or their languor, [003] so that, if languor is adjudged and attested, they may then receive the same day, [004] together with the demandant, at the Tower, lest, if they received a day at the [005] Bench and in court, the unitary nature of the cause should be lost. When before [006] the justices in the Bench they thus receive a day with the essoinee at the Tower, a [007] single essoin of difficulty in coming lies for them, at the Tower or before the justices [008] in court.1 If they do not come there nor essoin themselves, they may be in default, [009] like the demandant. If the infirmity is adjudged a passing illness, and a day certain [010] is given the essoinee to appear in court, on that day the others, who were not [011] essoined before, may then first begin their essoins, one or all, together or successively, [012] as was said above at the beginning.2 One or some may lose their essoin by [013] tacit renunciation. Suppose that A. appears and B. essoins himself of difficulty in [014] coming; he appears on another day and A. essoins himself; though at the beginning [015] B. had the choice of coming or essoining himself of bed-sickness, by choosing to [016] come he tacitly renounces the essoin of bed-sickness. Thus when he appears and [017] receives a day, on the second day he will not have an essoin of bed-sickness by [018] reason of the preceding essoin of difficulty in coming because of the interruption, [019] because he appeared, and because of tacit renunciation, and because the essoin of [020] bed-sickness does not immediately follow the essoin of difficulty in coming.3[If an [021] essoin of service of the lord king is cast between the two, the matter is disputable.]4 [022] Nor will he have [another] essoin of difficulty in coming, he who thus appears, before [023] all appear in court, because he has all his essoins or what amounts to them for [024] the reason aforesaid.5 All or some of them may default, in accordance with what [025] was said of the one above. One may lose his part by default, because of his negligence, [026] and the other save himself from default by his diligence, because the thing [027] sought, though it is common, admits of partition and division.6 That is not so in [028] the case of husband and wife, because a wife's property does not admit of division [029] between husband and wife. For the whole belongs to both, as a whole and not in [030] common, since husband and wife are one flesh though different souls. For that [031] reason, if one of them defaults it will be prejudicial to both.7 When a default has [032] been committed, let the land be seized into the lord