[Of appointing a forester] because of destruction and waste; of the provision of a penalty because of waste. [002] The king to the sheriff, greeting. Know that because of the destruction which was [003] done in the wood and in the land which A. of N. holds in dower in such a vill of the [004] inheritance of B. of N., it was provided in our court before our justices that the same [005] B. may appoint his forester for keeping the aforesaid wood, so that the aforesaid A. [006] may have there nothing except her rightful estovers for burning, building and [007] fencing on the land she holds in dower of the inheritance of the said B. in the same vill, [008] only by the view and livery of B.'s foresters. (If she continues incorrigible in the [009] lands, houses, gardens or pastures, let this clause then be added it was further [010] provided in our same court that the aforesaid B. there appoint his servant to take [011] care that the aforesaid A. cause no destruction in the houses, gardens and pastures, [012] and that she take from the men of that land only the rightful dues and services, which [013] they ought to and are accustomed to do.) And therefore we order you not to hinder [014] the aforesaid B. from appointing his forester (or his servant) as said above, lest [015] for your default we hear [further] complaint thereon. Witness etc.
It is important whether one commits waste in his own property or another's.
[017] There is property which is one's own, and that which is more completely one's own; [018] another's, and that which is more completely another's. More completely one's [019] own, [as] where in an estate one has the rights of possession and property; if he [020] commits waste therein it will not be a wrong to anyone (though it will cause damage [021] to himself) unless a servitude forbidding it is constituted by the modus of the gift, [022] that he may not. One's own, as where a man holds for his life only, where the tenant [023] has only the free tenement and another the proprietas. Here the tenant uses what is [024] in a way his own, because of the free tenement, to the extent of rightful estovers, [025] and thus commits no waste or injuria by using within measure. But if he exceeds [026] due measure by using and taking more than rightful estovers, he uses, so to speak, [027] another's property,1 and the waste will thus be wrongful, unless it is so slight that [028] no inquest is to be taken, as [in the roll] of Trinity term in the fifteenth year of king [029] Henry in the county of Bedford, [the case] of Peter Peivre.2 What is to be adjudged [030] waste and what not because it is grave or trifling, depends on local rules and custom. [031] Another's, as where one has an estate in his hand by reason of wardship, in which, [032] because