Plymouth was only a temporary order for preserving border peace without determining the rights and titles of either party. Finally the boundary line was determined largely in favor of Rhode Island, a portion of the Gore and of the eastern shore of Narragansett Bay being given to that colony. 218 When the commissioners reconvened, on September 4, Massachusetts entered an appeal from all parts of the judgment, Rhode Island from that part relating to the eastern boundary line. 219 In July, 1742, the petition and appeal of Rhode Island from several parts of the determination of the commissioners was referred to the Committee. In September the cross-appeal of Massachusetts from every part of the determination was similarly referred. 220 But no further action was taken in the matter until toward the close of 1744. Then, after four hearings of counsel, the Committee recommended dismissal of both appeals and confirmation of the determination of the commissioners. 221 Before the King in Council approved this report, Massachusetts, in February, 1745/6, presented a petition praying that upon consideration of certain evidence the King would reverse the June, 1741, commission judgment and affirm that of 1664; or, alternatively, that the King issue a commission of review, since the determinations of two previous sets of commissioners were in conflict. Thereupon, Rhode Island petitioned for dismissal of the Massachusetts petition as a precedent of the most dangerous kind and prayed that the Committee report be laid before the King in Council according to the constant practice in all other judicial appeals. 222 Agent Partridge also clandestinely 218 Ibid., 240-45. The exact judgment was that "the Eastern boundary of the said colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations towards the Massachusetts Bay is, shall be and runs from a certain point where a meridian line passing through Pawtucket Falls cuts the South boundary of the colony of the Massachusetts Bay south to Pawtuxet Falls then southerly along the eastward side of Seconk River and the river which runneth towards the town of Providence to the southwest corner of Bullock's Neck then northeast three miles then along the aforesaid lines running at three miles distance from the northeasternmost parts of the said bay to the said bay at or near Towoset Neck, then as the said bay runs to the southermost part of Shawamset Neck and then in a strait line to aforesaid point opposite to the said neck then East three miles and then along the aforesaid lines running at three miles distance from the eastermost parts of the said bay to the sea, all which lines are to be run by making the proper allowance for the variation of the magnetick needle from the meridian." See the map in 2 Arnold, op. cit., facing p. 132. For the Massachusetts attitude toward the judgment see 2 Hutchinson, op. cit., 305. 219 MS Proc. R.1.-Mass. Boundary Comm., 1741, 245-49. For the colony act authorizing the appeal see 5 Rec. Col. R.L, 29-30. Later, was appropriated to prosecute the appeal (ibid., 35). For the provincial authorization see 6 MS Mass. Archives (Colonial, 1724-75), 572. Christopher Kilby and Robert Auchmuty were designated agents to handle the appeal (ibid., 573). 220 PC 2/97/204, 235. For copies of the two petitions and appeals see R.1.-Mass. Boundary MSS. 221 PC 2/98/562, 583, 591, 594. Cf. 1 Correspondence of the Colonial Governors of Rhode Island, 289; 53 MS Mass. Archives (Letters, 1738-50), 184-85. 222 PC 2/99/367-68. Cf. 5 Rec. Col. R. 1., 116-1 7, 121; 1 Correspondence of the Colo-