general an abstract of all proceedings in the courts within the respective governments 461 Governor Handasyd o£ Jamaica immediately questioned the value of such transmission. To send all the process and pleadings in every cause would be too expensive for the court officers; to send the names of the parties and the nature of the action would be of little use. 462 Other governors were more co-operative. 463 Between 1703 and 1713 instructions were dispatched to eight colonies to transmit periodically to the Board of Trade accounts of the causes determined and pending in the respective colonies. 464 Massachusetts received the instruction in 1728, 465 but by that date the instruction was regarded as obsolete. 466 Therefore, in the 1730 instructions to Governor Belcher the article was omitted as having achieved no compliance, as being a great expense, and as of little or no use. 467 Measures were then taken to exact more specific information concerning appeals to the King in Council. In the decade following 1730 virtually all the royal colonies were instructed in varying language to transmit to the Board of Trade authentic copies of all proceedings in causes in which appeals were taken to the King in Council. 488 It is doubtful whether this instruction ever received the obedience due it. Lieutenant-Governor Clarke of New York submitted whether the instruction should stand, since a copy of the record had to be transmitted and laid before the King in Council where the appeal was determined. 469 Commenting upon the instruction in 1752, Governor Grenville of Barbados stated that copies of all proceedings in such appeals were taken out by both parties, certified by clerks of the respective courts in which the appeals were lodged, and authenticated by the governor under the Great Seal to the end that they might be produced before the King in Council at the appeal hearing. Grenville could not learn that any governor had followed the instructions, but as no mischief was known to have ensued from the disobedience, it was submitted whether instructional continuation was necessary. 470 Complaints as to judicial oppression and maladministration as opposed to judicial error fell within the province of the Board of Trade. 471 During the incumbency of Governor Grey of Barbados numerous complaints were made as to undue proceedings and great delay in the administration of justice. 472 i6l lbid., 1702-3, #578. 462 ibid., #874. 463 See CO 28/7/#6 4 i, ii; CO 28/i3/#io4 ix, x; JCTP, 1708/9-1714/5, 96, 102, 189, 447, 455; ibid., 1714/5-1718, 206, 281, 293; ibid., 1718-1722, in, 178; ibid., 1722/3- 1728, 35. 53- 464 1 Labaree, Royal Instructions, #423, 435. 465 Ibid., #423. 466 Lieutenant-Governor Mathew of the Leeward Islands wrote that Secretary Smith stated that "the Clerks o£ the Offices at home told him, that instruction was obsolete, and more for forme sake than for any use they can be of at home" {CSP, Col., 1728-29, #318). i6 Ubid., 1730, #128. 468 1 Labaree, Royal Instructions, #423. 469 CO 5/1059/GG 57. *™CO 28/30/DD 21. 471 See the commission provision in 4 Doc. Rel. Col. Hist. N.Y., 145. 472 CSP, Col., 1700, #843, 975, 993, 1030