Right. 81 But appeal by immediate application to the King in Council was also regarded as a procedural possibility. 82 In the province of West New Jersey there was a judicial lag, and the first regulation of appeals to England was made in 1699. 83 In Bermuda the Governor and Council acted as a court of chancery in causes over sterling by virtue of a 1691 act. From this court, parties might take an appeal to the King in Council if application were immediately made in court; not otherwise. Appellant was to give in sufficient security within ten days to prosecute the appeal with effect within the twelve months following the ten-day period or to pay treble damages to the party aggrieved, the casualties of the seas and other inevitable dangers only excepted. This chancery court also exercised appellate jurisdiction in any matters criminal and civil determinable in the General Assizes, but the statute is obscure as to the right of further appeal to England in these cases. 84 By a 1694 act appellants to the Governor and Council were to prosecute appeals within thirty days after application therefor by filing bills in the Secretary's Office. 85 A 1694 Maryland act for appeals and regulating errors provided for an "appeal" or for writ of error to the Governor and Council from any Provincial Court judgment wherein the original debt or damages exceeded sterling or 20,000 pounds of tobacco. Security provisions were the same as governed on appeal from the County Courts to the Provincial Court. Any persons aggrieved by any Chancery Court sentence, subject to the same minimum as at law, also 81 Learning and Spicer, op. cit., 272-73. The act declared that in any suit in the Court of Common Right where an appeal was taken to the King or Council Board by the defendant and not prosecuted according to security given, such appeal should be adjudged as taken for vexation and delay only. Appellant therein should be incapable of bringing or exhibiting any bill or suit in the Chancery of the Court of Common Right against plaintiff in such action, but execution should issue on the judgment appealed from without delay. Proviso was made that if security should be given for prosecuting the appeal or for not committing waste, the appellant or his security were to be at liberty to apply to Chancery for relief in equity against the penalty of the bond. 82 In November, 1687, the Board of Proprietors considered the advisability of an appeal to the King in Council from a judgment in ejectment involving proprietary rights. "Upon consideration its the cense of this Board that an appeale bee not desired to the King and Council ... for that the Proprietors may at any time obtain a mandamus to have the Record before the King and Council there to be reheard" (Edsall, op. cit., 95). 83 The 1693 Act for a Court of Appeals (Learning and Spicer, op. cit., 517) made no provision for appeals to England. The 1699 Act for Provincial Judges {ibid., 563) provided that the General Assembly be the supreme judicial body unless an appeal be demanded to England; in the latter case the appellant was to find sufficient security to prosecute the appeal within eighteen months and to pay the costs of court from which the appeal was taken and to abide the judgment of said court until reversal. In 1684 Samuel Cole was denied an appeal to England by the court at Burlington (The Burlington Court Boo\ of West Neu/ Jersey, 1680-iyog [1944; ed. by H. C. Reed and G. J. Miller]). Later, appeals were granted to the General Assembly, although "the Court say though they find noe law for it in the book of Assemblies Acts" (ibid., 141). 84 Acts of Assembly of Bermuda, i6g0'713/4 '713/4 (i7!9)> 18-20. 85 Ibid., 35.