advisers as referees might advise reversal or affirmance, or it might advocate further hearings before commissioners in the islands. 102 A conciliar letter would then issue based upon the certificate. 103 If a rehearing before commissioners was advised and ordered, provision might be made for further conciliar action in the cause. This could be obtained by authorizing certification of the proceedings of the commissioners to the Council Board in case of inability to settle the cause, or by allowing an appeal to the Council from the commissioners' proceedings. 101 Our account necessarily oversimplifies the conciliar procedure and eliminates the procedural probability that ancillary points might be raised during the prosecution of an appeal with petitions, references, certificates, and orders thereon. 105 Receiving multifarious petitions, making references thereof, issuing orders upon advice of other groups, and holding few hearings on the merits, the Privy Council at this period assumed the function of an administrative rather than a judicial body. As to the procedure adopted by the legal advisers, there is no wealth of in- good to referre the examinasion of his cause unto you. In which, when you have enformed your selves throughlie of all pointes of substance or difficultie and considered what is fitt to be donne for his reliefe, we require you to certifie us of your opinions therein with convenient expedition (as in like cases you have used by our direction), diat we maie give order accordinglie in the same." See also Paine v. Fautrat (14 ibid., 31). 102 In Perin v. Perin (19 ibid., 35), affirmance was advised. In de la March v. Gosselin (28 ibid., 36), re-examination was advised, if precedents permitted. Double references might occur, i. e., a certificate returned by Doctors Dale and Aubrey was referred to the Judge of the Admiralty to proceed thereon (11 ibid., 14). 103 It is difficult to determine how closely the Council followed the reports of its legal advisers—whether they were accepted in toto without further consideration, or whether suitors were afforded opportunity to "appeal" from the report of the legal advisers to the Council Table. See the language of a 1588 conciliar entry: "This day John Carteret of the Isle of Jersey being heard before the Lords upon an appeale" (16 APC, Dom., 4). On December 15, 1589, we find the cryptic conciliar entry that, "In the after noone the Lordes did here Jerysshe cawses" (18 ibid., 262). See die interpretation placed upon this sentence by Pollard (Council, Star Chamber, and Privy Council under the Tudors, 38 EHR, 58). 104 See de la Rocque v. de la Rocque (26 APC, Dom., 32); Blundell v. de Soulement (28 ibid., 514); Journeaulx v. Hampton (28 ibid., 538). In Beauvoir v. Beauvoir, in case either party refused to abide by the decision of the insular referees, bonds were to be taken for appearance of the parties before the conciliar legal advisers active in the cause (28 ibid., 546-47). Cf. supra, n. 95, where no preliminary reference to legal advisers was made. 100 f/hg re gular course of appellate procedure was diverted by failure of respondents to appear (Paine v. Fautrat, 14 APC, Dom., 47; Rowse v. Gower, 19 ibid., 322; Bisson v. Stocall, 31 ibid., 342); jurisdictional objections (Paine v. Fautrat, 14 ibid., 31; Guillam v. Le Court, 32 ibid., 194; Sare v. Lempriere, 31 ibid., 255); recalcitrance to commission jurisdiction (Gallie v. de la Rocque, 25 ibid., 396; Guillam v. Le Court, 31 ibid., 401; Sare v. Lempriere, 31 ibid., 456); recalcitrance to referee orders (Dumaresq v. Guillam, 29 ibid., 72); the recalcitrance of the courts below (Drake v. Macham, 28 ibid., 106; Beauvoir v. Beauvoir, 29 ibid., 251); failure of commissions to afford relief (Regina v. Beauvoir, 22 ibid., 115; de Carteret v. Dumaresq, 29 ibid., 67; Blundell v. de Soulement, 30 ibid., 699); conciliar change of opinion (de Carteret v. Dumaresq, 29 ibid., 684); death of parties to the appeal (de Carteret v. Dumaresq, 30 ibid., 705).