may make the rarer shift from Bordeaux to Dublin. 10 In the final analysis it is to the muniments of administration and to the men who learn their uses in different climes and circumstances that one must look for the elements of cohesion without which no concept of empire can be said to exist. We can here conveniently refer to but one type of instrument to make at once the points of cohesion and of continuity in dominion administration, and what we shall have to say must of necessity be largely by way of suggestion, since every form used in imperial administration still awaits exhaustive study. As the American colonists quickly learned, the governor's commission was a document of great significance for their affairs—indeed, it came to be viewed on both sides of the water as possessing a basic constitutional force. The eminent Sir Bartholomew Shower might argue scornfully before the House of Lords in 1693 1J that the common law knew no such office as governor; but under such aliases as seneschal, king's lieutenant, warden, or lord deputy, the Chancery had been familiar with it for centuries. In general, and by whatever name this type of agency was known, it comprehended certain basic functions. Whether it was exercised in Gascony, Ireland, or the Channel Islands, the office involved the duty of captain general, 12 precisely as it later did in the royal colonies of America. It involved a certain responsibility for material royal rights, specifically lands. It involved certain jurisdictional authority. It involved certain fiscal obligations, as well as rights. We do not mean to imply that a full and complete definition of all these functions can be demonstrated by early records, as they can be by the commissions of the late seventeenth century. On the contrary, the particulars of a deputy's powers underwent a process of development and accretion not yet terminated when James Stuart succeeded to the English throne. The point of departure appears to have been a simple and terse appointment to an office. 13 This was quite in accord with the English practice pursued with respect to certain governmental jobs, such as a commission to the Common Bench, where the precise functions were a matter of usage. Such a form is used, for example, with respect to the seneschalry of Gascony, 14 where the duties, in so far as they were not traditional, would be assumed pursuant to subsequent explicit warrants. The English combination of a commission for 10 Lodge, Constables of Bordeaux under Edward 111, 50 EHR 225 et seq., has an account of the careers of various such officials; cf. esp. John Travers (ibid., 232 n. 18), and Robert Wykford (ibid., 236). 11 Dutton v. Howell, Shower PC. 24. 12 1 Bemont, Roles Gascons (Supp.) exx; Lodge, Gascony under English Rule, 137-38; Le Patourel, The Medieval Administration of the Channel Islands (1935). 4°; Wood, The Office of Chief Governor of Ireland 1272-1509, in 36 Proceedings Royal Irish Academy, No. 12. 13 E.g., Seneschal of Gascony, Bemont, Roles Gascons, no. 1704; Warden of the Channel Islands, Patent Rolls 1225-1232, 350. 14 1 Bemont, op. cit. (Suppl.) exx ("Ses pouvoirs n'etaient pas encore nettement definis").