Harvard Law School Library

Bracton Online -- English

Previous   Volume 4, Page 62  Next    

Go to Volume:      Page:    




[001] plea, in which case, if he does not appear on the first day nor essoin himself in the
[002] special plea, he will be in default, nor will he be excused though he has been essoined
[003] of the common summons. But if in the special plea, he is excused by that essoin with
[004] respect to the common summons, though he is not specially essoined of that. We must
[005] see, where a special summons ought to be made, what happens if he who is to be summoned
[006] is not found. If he is found, let the summons be made him wherever he is found,
[007] in his domicile or outside it, with two witnesses at least who may attest it if need be.
[008] If he is not found, the summoners are not bound to seek him beyond his domicile. If
[009] he is found there, let the summons be made him, as aforesaid, if he is not, let it be
[010] made to his household, to be communicated to him when he returns. If he has several
[011] domiciles in the county, let the summons be made him at the domicile where he usually
[012] lives, or where he has the greater part of his property. If he has neither domicile
[013] nor demesne in the county, let the summons then be made at his fee, if he has a fee.
[014] When he has thus, in whatever way, been warned by the summons, he cannot leave
[015] the kingdom so as to provide himself with the delays of ‘beyond the sea,’ as will be
[016] explained below.1 And what if, though so warned by the summons, he leaves the kingdom
[017] and on his day is essoined of beyond the sea? Since that essoin does not lie, I ask
[018] whether it may be turned into an essoin of difficulty in coming, which would well lie
[019] if he had so essoined himself at the outset. It seems at first sight that it may, for if
[020] one first essoins himself of bed-sickness where he ought to have essoined himself
[021] of difficulty in coming, the order not being observed, the essoin of bed-sickness is
[022] turned into an essoin of difficulty in coming: he who does a greater thing does a lesser.2
[023] The same reason seems to be applicable in the case above, that the essoin of beyond
[024] the sea is turned into an essoin of difficulty in coming when the person summoned was
[025] warned by the summons. But the two cases are not the same, for in one both essoins
[026] are available and one is turned into the other because the order was not observed. In
[027] the other only one is available, that is, the essoin of difficulty in coming of this side the
[028] sea, not beyond it. Hence when one has essoined himself by an essoin of beyond the
[029] sea which does not lie, not by an essoin of this side which does, it seems and it is true
[030] that he will lose both, because an essoin which does not lie cannot change to an essoin
[031] which does not lie though it ought to. We must see who may summon. It is clear that
[032] everyone who has jurisdiction and the power to judge, either



Notes

1. Infra 74

2. Infra 108


Contact: specialc@law.harvard.edu
Page last reviewed April 2003.
© 2003 The President and Fellows of Harvard College