[001] entry except through such a one [C.] who wrongfully and without judgment disseised [002] such a one [D.] after D. had disseised [B], the plaintiff or his heir, near or remote, or [003] [the writ may be drawn] without mention of entry.> If the tenement is transferred [004] beyond the third hand, the writ of entry will not lie, unless one says that a writ may [005] be drawn without any mention of entry, in this way: Order A. to restore to B. rightfully [006] etc. so much land etc. of which C. of N. wrongfully etc. disseised the same B or [007] E. the father or other ancestor of the same B., whose heir he is, as he says. If the [008] writ ought to be drawn for the heir of the disseisee against the disseisor himself, who [009] is still alive,1[how that ought to be done may be seen well enough from what has gone [010] before.] When the tenant has been summoned, on the day given him he may essoin [011] himself (as may the demandant if he wishes); after the essoin he may claim the view, [012] which will lie. He may also vouch a warrantor, whether the writ mentions entry or [013] not, provided that if it does the voucher be made from person to person of those named [014] in the writ, and from warrantor to warrantor in order, until the disseisor himself or [015] his heir is reached. Warrantors other than those named in the writ ought not to be [016] called, for if those not named and outside the writ could be called, for the same reason [017] that one could be called, a thousand could be,2 and thus the writ of entry would not [018] hold. But if no mention is made of entry in the writ, as above, neither of degrees nor of [019] persons, many may then be called ad infinitum. If entry is mentioned, the tenant may [020] reply in many ways to the writ and to the other matters, as above: that his entry is [021] not through the person named in the writ but another, such a one, not named, and if [022] this is proved the writ falls. [Or] that it was not the ancestor named who disseised him [023] but another, [or] that he was not disseised wrongfully but rightfully. The heir of the [024] disseisor will have almost all the answers and defences which the disseisor himself [025] would have against an assise of novel disseisin if he had lived, since the writ of entry [026] partakes of the nature of an assise of novel disseisin in every respect, [as to restitution, [027] not as to punishment,] and all may be determined by a jury. But the punishment for [028] the injuria3 is extinguished, for no corporal punishment is to be inflicted because of [029] the kind of disseisin, nor are damages incurred, nor will an ox be given, only an [030] amercement for wrongful detention.45When the assise of novel disseisin has been [031] taken, whether it is the tenant or the plaintiff who has lost, if often happens that the [032] jurors have sworn falsely and that he who has lost sues by a jury of twenty-four to [033] convict the twelve, and that before