Note. As already noted, D’s work is transitional between that of the glossators and that of the commentators. He also seems to have died relatively young, and so, as it were, did not ‘prepare his work for publication’. Later printers, manuscript cataloguers, and even modern scholars have difficulty classifying it and sometimes resort to categories that are out of date or that anticipate what is to come. Our division here largely follows that of Lange/Kriechbaum, Kommentatoren and so suffers a bit from forward-looking anachronism, of which the authors are aware and discuss. In addition to A. Padovani in DGI and Lange/Kriechbaum, there is list of works, manuscripts, and early printed editions in R. Bargioni, Dino da Mugello 27–36. The work is over a century old, and Bargioni clearly relied on citations to sources that he had not seen, so we do not use his work without confirmation. We checked everything that he derived from Savigny and the information found in Savigny himself. We did not check the manuscripts and early printed editions that Bargioni did not derive from Savigny. There may be gold there, but we leave that to others. Independently of the sources already cited we checked GW and WorldCat for early printed editions and Dolezalek’s Manuscripta juridica for manuscripts.

Commentaria, Additiones, Glossae contrariae, etc. In the Biography, we followed Padovani’s categories, and described various works of D. as ‘allegationes’, ‘quaestiones’, ‘lecturae’. Here we follow the categories in Lange/Kriechbaum, and so begin with two items, the first of which is very much like a later commentarius and the second of which seems to be on the way. The third category, glossae contrariae, was separated out by the makers of manuscripts and the printers very early, and deserved treatment in its own right. The second category, additiones, encompasses a large number of short notes, some of which are in print, and many of which are not. One can apply different categories to these items if one wants to, but they have in common that in them D., like the later commentators, seems to assume the existence of the ordinary gloss even if he does not always refer to it. The remaining categories are designed to reflect what the manuscripts or the cataloguers call these items. In some cases, they may contain pieces of D’s lecturae.

Commentaria.

De regulis iuris. As A. Padovani notes in DGI, D’s commentary or lectura on the title De regulis iuris in the Sext (VI 5.[13]) was a huge success. There are at least 43 manuscripts, 18 incunabula, and probably as many as 50 editions printed after 1500. There seems little doubt that it was composed in conjunction with D’s work on the title of the same name in the Sext. Whether the work is sufficiently founded in canon law is somewhat controversial. The work is clearly dependent on D’s earlier work on Dig. 50.17, developed in the course of his lectures on the Digestum novum at Bologna. It is probably significant, however, that Johannes Andreae, having earlier made caustic remarks about D’s knowledge of canon law, cites D. in his Novella in Sextum.

De actionibus. The work is less coherent than De regulis iuris. It contains a commentary on JI.4.6, a lectura on the rest of procedural titles of JI that Diplovatatius at 196 tells us was reported by an otherwise unknown Orlandinus de Pisis, and a commentary on Johannes Bassianus’ arbor actionum that D., or a later compiler, seems to have regarded as part of the same work.

Additiones. A simple search for ‘Dinus’ or ‘Dinus de Mugello’ in Manuscripta juridica returns the same list of 95 manuscripts that contain D’s additiones to all the parts of the Corpus iuris civilis, as it is now understood. A. Padovani in DGI says that D. also made additiones to the L.F. That may be so. We did not find any, but we did not fully search the contents of all 95 manuscripts. Further analysis will be found below under Manuscripts.

Glossae contrariae. Whether or not D. regarded his glosses that take this form as being separate from his other efforts, makers of manuscripts gathered them together separately, and the early printers followed suit.

Repetitiones. It may be doubted whether D. made any repetitiones, at least as that form of literature was later understood. Diplovatatius, however, thought that he did. He lists four at 196–197, on Dig. 13.4.8, Dig. 14.4.9.1, Dig. 3.3.33.2, Dig. 13.6.3.2, and one more on at 200 on Dig. 12.1.40. The one on Dig. 13.4.8 would seem to be in BAV, Borgh. lat. 274. There are four more manuscripts that contain what are said to be D’s repetitiones. See Manuscripts under Repetitiones. There is also an early print of what is said to be repetitio of D’s on a passage in the Digestum novum that cannot be identified. See Early Editions under Additiones, Lyon 1523.

Lecturae, commenta, and summulae. Manuscripta juridica lists items attributed to D. under the following titles that do not correspond to the ones that we use elsewhere: lectura (omitting lecturae on JI.4.6 or on the Arbor actionum, which we list separately), commenta or commentum, and summula. Some of the lecturae are quite substantial, and some of them seem to be formally different from additiones. The other titles are few and do not look as if they are any different from additiones or extracts therefrom or from lecturae. We list the items under Manuscripts.

Vocabularies, Definitions. It seems unlikely that D. wrote a separate vocabulary or collection of definitions. The variety of titles in the manuscript attributions suggests as much. Savigny at 464 found one called ‘Tractatus dictionum’ in a manuscript belonging to Hänel, which we think we have identified below under Manuscripts. What seems to have happened is that various makers of manuscripts collected vocabulary or definitional items from D’s works to which manuscript rubricators or cataloguers later gave titles.

Tractatus. There are a number of treatises ascribed to D. in the manuscripts, some of which are also found in the early prints. Most of them are quite short, the kind of thing that D. could have written in a longer additio or as part of a lectura, which the maker of a manuscript then took out and called – or a manuscript cataloguer then called – a tractatus. Certainly, relatively few of them have the form of a tractatus as that genre came to develop in the 14th century. We summarize the evidence below; more will be found in Manuscripts and in Early Editions.

De successionibus ab intestato. There are two different treatises with this title. One is by D.; the other is usually ascribed to Cinus, though there are those who doubt the attribution. See the article on Cinus. Early printers, and, even makers of manuscripts, got them mixed up, and also ascribed one of them to Bartolus. Diplovatatius at 278 tells us that the treatise ascribed to Bartolus was, in fact, written by Dynus de Pistoria, who is probably the quite obscure jurist named Dinus Torsiglierus de Pistoria, for whom see Vittorio Capponi, Bibliografia pistoiese (Pistoia 1874) 329, s.n. Torseglieri, Dino (online). Lange/Kriechbaum suggest that the version described in ed. Köln 1569 as ‘Tractatus authenticus Dini Mugellani’ is, in fact, the one by D. It contains citations to canon law, whereas ?Cinus’ treatise does not. We list, under Manuscripts, 75 surviving manuscripts that are said to contain D’s treatise, with some attempt to sort out which ones actually do. There are many early prints. The listing in Early Printed Editions is selective.

De interesse. There are three printed editions, including one incunabulum, and two manuscripts, so the attribution is no more uncertain than many. The incipts of the manuscripts suggest that this item was thought of more as a quaestio than as a tractatus.

De praescriptionibus. There are nine manuscript examples and sixteen early prints. Hence, the attribution seems solid. The nature of the work and its ultimate origin in Dinus’ opus requires more study.

De praesumptionibus. Savigny at 462 lists from earlier bibliographies prints of Köln 1576 and 1579. We did an extensive search in all the Köln imprints in those years in WorldCat and did not find it. (There is one slightly misspelled version of the Tractatus de praescriptionibus printed by Johannes Gymnicus in 1576: Aurea practica Ioannis Berberii . . . una cum Tractatu de prascriptionibus Dyni Mugellani.) It is possible that the Tractatus de praesumptionibus is buried in a multi-authored work that the cataloguers have not fully analyzed, but we did not list it under Early Printed Editions because we cannot confirm it. It is not listed in G. Colli’s, Bibliografia. There are two manuscript examples, both of which have incipits that look like those of a tractatus.

De quartis. Savigny at 494 reports a Tractatus quartarum by D. in a Wien manuscript. Assuming a change in shelfmark, we have found that manuscript and two others. There are no early prints. The item elaborates a series of distinctiones in which quarters are used.

De cumulatione actionum. Not in the early prints. There are two manuscript examples, the incipit of one of which looks like a quaestio. As Savigny at 494 reports, Cinus ad C.2.1.2 (Frankfurt 1588), fol. 47ra–b (online), says that D. wrote a tractatus on this topic that he later put in De regulis iuris, regula 20: ‘Nullus pluribus uti defensionibus prohibetur’.

De vulgari et pupillari substitutione. Not in the early prints. There are five manuscript examples with this title that may not all be the same work. Savigny at 494 reports that it is in a Hänel manuscript, which we seem to have found. He also reports that the teatise is more commonly attributed to Cinus, citing passages from Cinus’ commentary on the Codex that deal with the same topic. Our manuscripts do not support an attribution to Cinus. The item would seem to be an extract from D’s additio to, or lectura on, the rubric of Dig. 28.6.

De primo et secundo decreto. Three manuscript examples and an incunabulum copy make the attribution of this item no less certain than many of the others. It may be an additio to, or a piece of a lectura on, D.39.2.15. See also Manuscripts under additiones, Madrid, BN 397.

De tormentis. Not attributed to D. in the early prints. Like the parallel treatise De quaestionibus, sometimes ascribed to Bartolus, modern scholarship strongly doubts that this is D’s work. That a Tractatus de tormentis is ascribed to D. in a 16th-century manuscript does not seem to be a sufficient counter-argument. When we add, however, the tractatus De quaestionibus ascribed to him in six other manuscripts (one, De quaestionibus et tormentis), the problem becomes more complicated. A. Padovani in DGI suggests that the success of the treatise in so many schools led to assigning to it the name of the masters who had used it: ‘Whether D. was its author or not, his position as one of the most accredited and most cited authors on the origins of the problem of torture marked him as a central figure of the new field of criminal procedural scholarship’.

De modis arguendi. Found in three manuscripts and one early print. Discussed in the Biography and in a separate article. The attribution to D. is solid. The work is not a tractatus in the traditional sense, but a brief list of the types of legal arguments. D’s work has been edited by S. Caprioli. It gave rise to a body of literature of this genre also explored and edited by S. Caprioli.

Ordo iudiciarius. This is what Lange/Kriechbaum call a ‘Lehrgedicht’ or as one of the manuscripts rather charmingly calls it ‘Carmen de iudiciis’: 142 doggerel hexameters, designed to help students to memorize the steps in Romano-canonical procedure. It is found in six manuscripts, although only two ascribe it to D. Despite that fact, Wahrmund accepted the attribution to D. in his edition, and more modern scholarship has not come up with any reason to doubt it.

Miscellaneous. We list below under Manuscripts various basically ‘one-off’ treatise-like items that are found attributed to D. in manuscripts. None are in the early prints. The absence of other witnesses should call any of these attributions into question. In the case of the Tractatus de fama the misattribution is virtually certain. In the case of the Tractatus de cessione iurium, the only one that has two manuscript witnesses, an attribution to D. is plausible. Further investigation of the others is called for.

Consilia and quaestiones. We tend to think of these two categories as being quite different, but in D’s case they tend to blur. This is because it is hard to find anything that looks like a formal quaestio disputata in any of the surviving records that bear the label quaestio. There is a passage in Albericus de Rosate’s Comm. ad C.1.3.5 (online) that says: ‘& hic Dom. Dy. in quaestionibus suis 61. quaestione quæ incipit “cum Gaius Seius” post multa distinguit’. That suggests that the 16th-century printer had access to numbered list of D’s quaestiones, but not necessarily that it was a quaestio disputata. Diplovatatius tells us (at 199): ‘Dinus de anno 1259. 4. Februarii disputavit quaestionem, incipit: “Cavetur in quodam statuto civitatis Lucane”.’ Though Diplovatatius seems to think that this was a quaestio disputata, the incipit, which has not been found, looks more like a consilium. Of consilia we can be more sure. D. is the first civilian jurist from whom a substantial number of consilia survive. The fullest printed editions have 53, Bargioni transcribed an additional four from Bolognese manuscripts (81–93 [2 pages at the end seem to be missing from the online copy]), and Dolezalek lists 14 manuscripts that contain them, at least some of which have incipits that do not correspond to any of the printed ones.

De regulis iuris.

Manuscripta juridica focuses on civilian manuscripts rather than canonistic. With this in mind, we first searched for manuscripts of D’s De regulis iuris by searching for ‘Dinus de Mugello AND De regulis iuris’ on the aggregative website known as ‘Mirabile’. We then searched Manuscripta juridica for ‘Dinus de Mugello AND Apparatus ad Decretalium Librum Sextum 5.13 de regulis iuris’, Dolezalek’s normalized form of this title. The results of the two searches were quite different. The first search returned 32 manuscripts, 29 eliminating duplicates. The second returned 21 manuscripts, 20 eliminating the manuscript that is lost. Only 7 overlapped. The following list combines the two results, adding to the Mirabile results where the Dolezalek has information that is not contained in Mirabile, and noting those that appear only in Dolazalek. The list is not complete. The BAV website returned 11 manuscripts for the same search as we used for Mirabile. It is, however, a substantial sample.

Bamberg, Staatsbibl. Can. 60 (P.II.19), fol. 61ra–81rb

t036Txt01a_1Berkeley, Univ. Cal. (Berkeley), Bancroft Libr. MS UCB 103, fol. 1ra–20vb (Dolezalek only; = ff2Ms.uncat.1967.5.16.)

t036Txt01a_1Bologna, Coll. Spagna 118, fol. 214ra–237ra (Dolezalek only)

Braunschweig, Stadtbibl. 122, fol. 1r–105r

t036Txt01a_1Cambridge, St. John’s Coll. A.4 (Cat. 4), 3d ser. fol. 1–22 (Dolezalek only)

t036Txt01a_1Halle, Universitäts- u. Landesbibl. Ye 2° 30, fol. 1ra–38ra (Dolezalek only)

t036Txt01a_1Halle, Universitäts- u. Landesbibl. Ye 2° 43, fol. 64ra–99rb (Dolezalek only)

Halle, Universitäts- u. Landesbibl. Ye 2° 48, fol. 135ra–161rb

Hereford, Cath. Libr. O.IV.3, fol. III–X

Hereford, Cath. Libr. O.VII.5, fol. 182r–196v

Hereford, Cath. Libr. P.VI.7, fol. 155r–168r

Innsbruck, Universitätsbibl. 337, fol. 1ra–69vb

t036Txt01a_1Laon, BM 383, fol. 1r–55v (Entire manuscript in petia.)

Leipzig, Universitätsbibl. 1064

t036Txt01a_1London, BL Arundel 454, fol. 279–[280] (Dolezalek only. Fragment, ends with the beginning of regula 2.)

t036Txt01a_1Lucca, Bibl. Cap. Felin. 146, III (fol. 99–120), fol. 100ra–120rb (Dolezalek gives the shelfmark as 146.2–6 and calls this item 4. ‘2–6’ may be the parts that contain the third foliation given here.)

t036Txt01a_1Madrid, BN 392, fol. 147ra–170ra (Dolezalek only)

t036Txt01a_1Madrid, BN 825, fol. 70r–[?] (Dolezalek only. Identification based on incipit.)

München, BSB clm 329, II (fol. 145r–165r)

München, BSB clm 6346, fol. 65ra–90vb

München, BSB clm 6347, fol. 50ra–72vb

Napoli, BN XIII.A.10, fol. 130r–139v

t036Txt01a_1Napoli, BN XIII.A.8, fol. 168r–194v (Item 2 in Dolezalek.)

Paris, BN lat. 4092

Paris, BN lat. 4093

t036Txt01a_1Poppi, BC Rilli-Vettori 432, I (fol. 2–120), fol. 116v–118r (The principal contents of this manuscript are humanistic and literary. We doubt that the first foliation refers to our item; the second may.)

t036Txt01a_1Roma, Bibl. Angelica 1749, fol. [164–202] (Dolezalek only. Identification based on incipit.)

Saint-Omer, BM 539, fol. 157r–159r

t036Txt01a_1Salzburg, Bibl. Seminar 13 (Cm 262), fol. 343vb–345va (According to the catalogue, this is only an extract on fol. 343vb.)

t036Txt01a_1Sankt Gallen, Stiftsbibl. 745, pag. 49a–87a (An excerpt De arbitriis.)

t036Txt01a_1Seu d’Urgell, Bibl. Cap. 2875 (12), fol. 185ra–215vb (The foliation comes from García, et al., Catálogo, 395–396, who also note that the manuscript is quite handsomely illustrated.)

t036Txt01a_1Siena, BC H.III.17, fol. 1ra–20ra (Although we have found references on Mirabile to this shelfmark as H.III.18, the library’s own catalogue, which is stored in the database Codex, gives H.III.17.)

t036Txt01a_1Tarazona, Bibl. Catedral 87 (item 1) (Dolezalek only)

Trier, Stadtbibl. Hs. 883/1643 2°, fol. 179r–196r

Città del Vaticano, BAV Borgh. lat. 98

t036Txt01a_1Città del Vaticano, BAV Borgh. lat. 434, fol. 117–[?] (Dolezalek only)

t036Txt01a_1Città del Vaticano, BAV Urb. lat. 156, fol. 1r–21v (Dolezalek only. See De actionibus, sub. ms. cit.)

Città del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 1452, fol. 131r–156v

Città del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 2589, fol. 1r–54r

Città del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 2661, fol. 15r–37v

t036Txt01a_1Vendôme, BM 87, fol. 31ra–48rb (Dolezalek only)

Wien, ÖNB Ink. 25 D 33

De actionibus.

The following list combines the results of searches in Manuscripta juridica for ‘Dinus AND Lectura institutionum 4.6 de actionibus’, Dolezalek’s standardized title for this work, for ‘Dinus AND Lectura Arboris actionum’, and for ‘Dinus AND Commentarius ad Arborem Actionum Johannis Bassiani’, both of which are Dolezalek’s standardized titles for the final piece of the work. As has been noted elsewhere, the Uppsala manuscript shows the tripartite nature of the work. The others deserve more attention than they seem to have received.

t036Txt01a_2Berlin, Staatsbibl. Lat. fol. 222 (Lectura institutionum 4.6 de actionibus, fol. 48ra–63rb [Dolezalek queries the attribution because the incipit does not correspond to that in Diplovatatius]; Commentarius ad Arborem actionum Johannis Bassiani, fol. 63rb–64ra.)

t036Txt01a_2Braunschweig, Stadtbibl. 32 (Lectura institutionum 4.6 de actionibus, fol. 117ra–165vb.)

t036Txt01a_2Budapest, Egyetemi Köniyvar 65 (Lectura institutionum 4.6 de actionibus, fol. 34–55 [followed by Johannes Bassianus’ Arbor actionum, but it does not say that it is D’s commentary on it].)

t036Txt01a_2Erlangen, Universitätsbibl. 371, fol. 58rb–59ra (Lectura Arboris actionum only.)

t036Txt01a_2Uppsala, Universitetsbibl. C.530 (Lectura institutionum 4.6 de actionibus, fol. 65ra–78ra [the lectura that Diplovatatius ascribes to Orlandinus de Pisis begins on fol. 71ra]; Commentarius ad Arborem actionum Johannis Bassiani, fol.78ra–vb.)

t036Txt01a_2Città del Vaticano, BAV Borgh. lat. 274 (Lectura institutionum 4.6 de actionibus, fol. 129rb–135va [does not quite correspond to ed. Venezia 1505]. For other items in this manuscript attributed to D., see Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt01a_2Città del Vaticano, BAV Urb. lat. 156 (Ascribed to D.: Apparatus ad Decretalium Librum Sextum 5.13 de regulis iuris, fol. 1r–21v; Additiones ad Decretalium Librum Sextum 5.13 de regulis iuris [D. and others; item 2], Lectura institutionum 4.6 de actionibus, 44v–63ra; Lectura Arboris actionum, fol. 63ra–64r; Additiones ad Infortiatum, fol. 67r–99vb. Ascribed to D. and others: Additiones ad Digestum novum, fol. 100r–145r.)

t036Txt01a_2Città del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 2337 (Lectura institutionum 4.6 de actionibus, fol. 151ra–178ra; Lectura Arboris actionum, fol. 178ra–179vb.)

Additiones.

A simple search for the author name ‘Dinus’ or ‘Dinus de Mugello’ in Manuscripta juridica returns two identical lists of 96 manuscripts all but one of which are additiones to parts of the Corpus iuris civilis: 6 on the Authentica, 18 on the Codex, 1 on the Infortiatum (to which should be added the one that responds to a call for ‘Dinus de Mugello in petia’), and 70 on the Digestum novum. The one that does not go with the Corpus iuris civilis is decribed as ‘Additiones ad Decretalium Librum Sextum 5.13 de regulis iuris [Multiplex]’. The majority of these manuscripts also contain the Accursian gloss and additiones by more than one author (‘Multiplex’ in Dolezalek’s parlance). We list here the ones where the only attribution of authorship of the additiones in the title is to D. That gives us 3 manuscripts of the Authentica and 28 of the Digestum novum, reduced to 25 by combining cases where the same manuscript has two entries. The result, analyzed below, shows that some of the refereced additiones are by D. and other authors, but that the manuscripts contain more that is attributed to D. than simply additiones to the part of the Corpus given in the title.

t036Txt01bBern, Burgerbibl. 18 (A collection of fragments from Bologna and Paris, sec. 13/2 and sec. 14/in. Ascribed to D. are: Additiones ad Infortiatum [fol. 148–168v]; Tractatus de cognatis et agnatis: fragm. [fol. 168v]; Additiones ad Institutiones [fol. 170–171v] [incomplete at end]; Additiones ad Authenticum [fol. 171v–176v] [incomplete at end]; Tractatus de successionibus ab intestato: fragm. [fol. 177r–192v].)

t036Txt01bParis, BN lat. 4436 (Additiones ad Authenticum [item 11], by D. and Jacobus.)

t036Txt01bVenezia, BN Lat. V.18 (2305 = Valentinelli v. 3 p. 15) (Additiones ad Authenticum [item 10] by D.; ‘G.’; Odofredus de Denariis, and others.)

t036Txt01bBologna, Coll. Spagna 272 (Additiones ad Digestum novum: fragm. [D.45.1], fol. 91r–115r, ascribed to D.)

t036Txt01bFrankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, MPI MS fragm. 1 (Additiones ad Digestum novum: fragm., ascribed to D. Only fol. 41 and 50 survive of what was originally 70 fols.)

t036Txt01bKiel, Kiel, Universitätsbibl. K.B.Kapsel B Nr.35 Teil I (A collection of fragments [item 3], by D.; Odofredus de Denariis; Rainerius de Arsendis [Forliviensis].)

t036Txt01bKaliningrad, Universitätsbibl. 10 (Dolezalek queries whether this manuscript may now be in Toruń, Biblioteka Uniwersytecka. Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum ascribed to D.)

t036Txt01bLondon, BL Arundel 453 (Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum, most bearing D’s siglum.)

t036Txt01bMadrid, BN 397 (Ascribed to D. are: Additiones ad Infortiatum [83ra–114vb] [lacks first additio in Lyon 1513]; Lectura ad Digestum novum, prima primae [fol. 115ra–119vb] [seems fairly clear that this is a lectura and not simply additiones; written in two different hands; runs from Dig. 39.1 to Dig. 41.2.3.10; may be the origins of the Tractatus super primo et secundo decreti]; Additiones ad Digestum novum corrected by Conradinus de Vico [Pisanus] [fol. 120ra–142vb] [fuller at the end than Lyon 1513]; Tractatus de interesse [142vb–143va].)

t036Txt01bMadrid, BN 920 (Ascribed to D.: Additiones ad Infortiatum [prima, 166–186va; secunda, fol. 186vb-210vb]; Additiones ad Digestum novum [prima, fol. 244ra–282; secunda, fol. 283ra–310]; Lectura Digesti novi, fol. 221–243rb [see Madrid, BN 397]. Ascribed to Azo and D.: Quaestio An cumulatio sit admittenda, fol. 213–218va [perhaps related to what is called D’s tractatus De cumulatione actionum].)

t036Txt01bParis, BN lat. 4479 (Many short interlinear additiones of D’s to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum.)

t036Txt01bParis, BN lat. 4483 (7 short additiones to Digestum novum [fol. 4vb], 5 with D’s siglum; his siglum is also found in the additiones to the Accursian gloss along with that of many others.)

t036Txt01bParis, BN lat. 4491 (Ascribed to D.: Additiones ad Digestum novum [items 2 and 6]; Additiones ad Infortiatum [items 1 and 5]; Repetitio D.34.5.13.3. [item 4].)

t036Txt01bParis, BN lat. 4492 (Ascribed to D.: Additiones ad Digestum novum [item 2]; Additiones ad Infortiatum [item 1].)

t036Txt01bParis, BN lat. 14341 (Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum with D’s siglum.)

t036Txt01bRoma, Roma, Arch. di Stato 1004 (D’s additiones to Dig. 39.1 [fol. 95ra–97rb].)

t036Txt01bSevilla, Bibl. Cap. 82-6-1 (A few additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum with D’s siglum.)

t036Txt01bTodi, BC 220, frammenti timbrati 51-52 (Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum with D’s siglum in incomplete manuscript.)

t036Txt01bTorino, BN Universitaria E.I.13 (Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum by D. and others.)

t036Txt01bTorino, BN Universitaria E.I.24 (Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum by D. and Jacobus de Arena.)

t036Txt01bTübingen, Universitätsbibl. Mc 99 (Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum by D. and Jacobus in incomplete manuscript.)

t036Txt01bCittà del Vaticano, BAV Arch.S.Pietro A.32 (Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum by D. [fol. 1].)

t036Txt01bCittà del Vaticano, BAV Borgh. lat. 274 (Extensive collection of items attributed to D.: Consilia [fol. 1ra–18rb]; Additiones ad Infortiatum [fol. 19ra–78va] [fuller than Lyon 1513]; Quaestiones ad Infortiatum [fol. 78vb–95rb] [cf. Tarazona 18, fol. 14ra]; Additiones ad Digestum novum [fol. 95va–124va] [fuller at the end than Lyon 1513]; Repetitio D.13.4.8 [fol. 124va–126ra]; Tractatus de cumulatione actionum [fol. 126ra–127vb]; Summula D.25.1 de impensis in res dotales factis [fol. 127vb–128ra]; Summula D.25.5 de missione in possessionem ventris nomine [fol. 128ra–rb]; Tractatus de interesse [fol. 128rb–129rb]; Lectura Institutionum 4.6 de actionibus [fol. 129rb–135va].)

t036Txt01bCittà del Vaticano, BAV Ott. lat. 1307 (Additiones ad Digestum novum by D. [fol. 44r–87v]; Lectura Digesti veteris by D. [fol. 151r–169r].)

t036Txt01bCittà del Vaticano, BAV Pal. lat. 747 (Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum by D. and others.)

t036Txt01bCittà del Vaticano, BAV Pal. lat. 753 (Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum by D. and others.)

t036Txt01bCittà del Vaticano, BAV Urb. lat. 156 (Ascribed to D.: Additiones ad Infortiatum. Ascribed to D. and others: Additiones ad Digestum novum. See De actionibus, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt01bCittà del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 1421 (Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum by D. and others.)

t036Txt01bCittà del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 1422 (Additiones to Accursian gloss on Digestum novum by D.)

Glossae contrariae.

The first alphabetical list of manuscripts derives from a search in Manuscripta juridica for ‘Dinus AND Concorda’, which returns 7 items with Dolezalek’s standardized title of ‘Concordantia glossarum contrariarum iuris civilis’. The second list derives from a search for ‘Dinus AND Gloss’, which, eliminating the duplicated Firenze manuscript, returns 6 items with Dolezalek’s standardized title of ‘Glossae contrariae’. In the second list Dolezalek was able, in some cases, to identify two recensions of the work on the basis of M. Bellomo, ‘Glossae contrariae’ 434. The last item comes from Harvard’s HOLLIS catalogue.

t036Txt01cFirenze, BN Magliabechi XXIX 172, fol. 4v–8v (With additiones by Rainerius de Arsendis [Forliviensis].)

t036Txt01cParis, Bibl. Mazarine 1434, fol. 41–[44] (With additiones by Rainerius de Arsendis [Forliviensis].)

t036Txt01cPraha, Národní Muz. Dobrovská Knihovna MS a 5, fol. 251ra–256va (Probably by D.; here ascribed to Bartolus de Saxoferrato. Includes (fol. 505va–507vb) Tracatus de successionibus ab intestato by D. or Dynus de Pistorio, here ascribed to Baldus.)

t036Txt01cSaint-Omer, BM 496 (21 pp. Dolezalek queries the attribution.)

t036Txt01cTorino, BN Universitaria E.I.21, fol. 78va (Probably incomplete; the incipit matches.)

t036Txt01cCittà del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 10726, fol. 474–[480] (With additiones by Rainerius de Arsendis [Forliviensis]. Base text probably by D.; here ascribed to Bartolus de Saxoferrato. For other contents, see Quaestiones, sub. ms. cit.)

t036Txt01cWien, ÖNB Cvpl. 5125, fol. 209r–213v (With additiones by Rainerius de Arsendis [Forliviensis]. Dolezalek queries the attribution of the base text.)

t036Txt01cBruxelles/Brussel, Bibl. Royale II 1442, fol. 87ra–89vb (With additiones. Also includes Tractatus de successionibus ab intestato, fol. 98r–101r)

t036Txt01cReims, BM fol. 167–[167v], 168–[168v], 168v–[169], 170–[170v] (Divided into those on the Digestum vetus, Infortiatum, Digestum novum, Codex; accompanied in the first and third cases by the additiones of Rainerius de Arsendis [Forliviensis].)

t036Txt01cUppsala, Universitetsbibl. C.559, fol. 182r–186r, 186r–192v (First recension – same as BAV Chigi E.VIII.245; second recension – same as Vat. lat. 2683.)

t036Txt01cCittà del Vaticano, BAV Chigi E.VIII.245, fol. 58ra–58vb (First recension – same as Uppsala C.559)

t036Txt01cCittà del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 2656, fol. 45r–49v (For other contents, see Consilia, sub. ms. cit.)

t036Txt01cCittà del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 2683, fol. 98va–102va (Second recension – same as Uppsala C.559)

t036Txt01cCambridge, MA, Harvard Law HLS MS 75, fol. 265r–267v (Extract only. Manuscript dated 1475. Also ascribed to D.: Tractatus super primo et secunto decreto, fol. 261v–264v; Carmen de iudiciis, cum commentario, fol. 252r–256v. Online.)

Repetitiones.

A search in Manuscripta juridica for ‘Dinus AND Repetit’ returns 7 manuscripts in 2 of which the attribution is to another Dinus. That leaves the 5 listed below.

t036Txt01dBerkeley, Univ. Cal. (Berkeley), Law Libr. Robbins MS 270, fol. 272v (Repetitio ad C.8.30.2 in what is basically a manuscript of the Digestum novum with glosses.)

t036Txt01dHuesca, Arch. Catedral 61, fol. 15v–16r (Repetitio ad D.39.5.2. See further Quaestiones, sub. ms. cit.)

t036Txt01dParis, BN lat. 4491 (item 4) (Repetitio ad D.34.5.13.3. See further Additiones, sub. ms. cit.)

t036Txt01dCittà del Vaticano, BAV Borgh. lat. 274, fol. 124va–126ra (Repetitio ad D.13.4.8. Perhaps the repetitio referenced by Diplovatatius at 196. See further Additiones, sub. ms. cit.)

t036Txt01dVerona, Bibl. Cap. CLXXIV -165-, fol. 34ra–vb (Repetitio ad D.29.2.1. Dolezalek queries the classification but not the attribution. Also contains a Tractatus de substitutionibus [fol. 31ra–32rb] and a Tractatus de successionibus ab intestato [fol. 37va–38rb] attributed to D.)

Lecturae, commenta, and summulae.

As noted in Texts, some of the lecturae listed below are quite substantial. In particular, it is possible that fairly complete copies of one or two lecturae on the Digestum novum survive in the Milano and Bologna manuscripts. We list the items below in alphabetical order by Dolezalek’s titles.

t036Txt01eSeu d’Urgell, Bibl. Cap. 2041, fol. 128ra (Commenta ad Digestum novum [Quaestiones]. Both Dolezalek and García, et al. Catalogo, 95–96, identify 7 items attributable to D. on this folio. García et al. give more detail. Both say that the second item is about D.45.1.96 and the third about D.45.1.84, and do not commit themselves to the topics of the others. On the basis of the incipits given in both, only no. 4 is in the form of a quaestio. García et al. list items on fol. 128va–b that they identify as ‘Commenta in aliquas regulas iuris’ [Dig. 50.17] by D. The Commentum ad D.33.7 that Dolezalek identifies on fol. 119va is reduced by García et al. to its rubric only. The incipit and explicit that Dolezalek gives is described by García et al. a separate, anonymous Quaestio de dictione exclusiva.)

t036Txt01eParis, BN lat. 4523 (Commenta. Short items in a late script on the verso of the opening flyleaf ascribed to D., Odofredus, Jacobus, and others.)

t036Txt01eMünchen, BSB clm. 28178, fol. 12r, 139va–140rb (Commentum ad C.1.3.54, ad C.6.25.10. See further Quaestiones, sub ms. cit. )

t036Txt01eFrankfurt am Main, Stadt- und Universitätsbibl. Barthol. 17 (Lectura Codicis. Codex manuscript with Accursian gloss and additiones, said to contain lecturae of D., along with those of others.)

t036Txt01eCittà del Vaticano, BAV Patetta 218, fol. 11va, 154r, 232r (Lectura Codicis. Codex manuscript with Accursian gloss, lecturae with siglum ‘dy’ on fols. indicated.)

t036Txt01eNew Haven, Conn., Yale Univ., Beinecke Libr. Beinecke MS 483:20 (Lectura Digesti Infortiati, 1 fol. Fragment, D.34.4.3–5.12.)

t036Txt01eMilano, BN AE/XIV/10 (Lectura Digesti novi, 128 fols.)

t036Txt01eBologna, BC Archiginnasio A. 973 (Lectura Digesti novi, sec. 15, 235 fols. Dolezalek suggests that this may be the Bolognese manuscript of D’s lectura on the Digestum novum to which Diplovotatius refers.)

t036Txt01eMadrid, BN 397, fol. 115ra–119vb (Lectura Digesti novi. Dolezalek suggests that this is what Savigny [5.453] calls the lost manuscript of D’s lectura. See further Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt01eMadrid, BN 920, fol. 221–243rb (Lectura Digesti novi. See further Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt01eSeu d’Urgell, Bibl. Cap. 2088, fol. 9ra–18ra et 19ra–51ra (Lectura Digesti novi. See further Quaestiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt01eSan Marino, Huntington Libr. El.7.H.9, fol. 55–62 (Lectura Digesti novi. Selected titles only.)

t036Txt01eCittà del Vaticano, BAV Ott. lat. 1307, fol. 151r–169r (Lectura Digesti veteris. Fragmentary. See further Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt01eErfurt, Universitätsbibl., Bibl. Amploniana CA 2° 227 (item 10) (Lectura iuris civilis. Short pieces by many authors, including D. Some of these may be consilia.)

t036Txt01eMadrid, BN 573 (item 1) (Lectura Triorum librorum. Multiple authors: Andreas Bonellus de Barulo, Jacobus de Ravanis, and D. See further Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt01eCittà del Vaticano, BAV Borgh. lat. 274, fol. 127vb–128ra, 128ra–rb. (Summula ad D.25.1 de impensis in res dotales factis; Summula ad D.25.5 de missione in possessionem ventris nomine. See further Additiones, sub. ms. cit.)

Vocabularies, Definitions.

We list the items here in order of the titles that appear in Manuscripta juridica.

t036Txt01fMünchen, BSB clm. 26669, fol. 113–[116] (Definitiones terminorum iuridicorum [‘Expositiones’]. See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt01fMünchen, BSB clm. 7580, fol. 34–[37] (Definitiones terminorum iuridicorum [‘Expositiones’]. See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt01fLyon, BM 387, fol. 60r–64v (Tractatus de adverbiis. Dolezalek notes that this item is ascribed elsewhere to Bartolus, but here it is ascribed to D.)

t036Txt01fBologna, Coll. Spagna 70 (item 20) (Tractatus de dictionibus.)

t036Txt01fLeipzig, Universitätsbibl. Hänel 15, 298r–299v (Tractatus de dictionibus. See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt01fStuttgart, Würtembergische Landesbibl. Cod. jur. 2° 123, fol. 49ra–51rb (Tractatus de dictionibus. See further De quaestionibus, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt01fModena, Bibl. Estense a.W.3,8 – lat.382, fol. [209–219] (Tractatus de dictionibus, in forma vocabularii.)

t036Txt01fKraków, Bibl. Jagiellońska 412, 272–280 (Tractatus de significationibus dictionum, et specialiter prepositionum, adverbiorum, coniunctionum etc. Ascribed to D. with additions by Johannes de Imola. Also ascribed to D. and Johannes de Imola: Florilegium legum, fol. 281–282.)

De successionibus ab intestato.

A search in Manuscripta juridica for ‘Dinus AND Tractatus de successionibus ab intestato’ returns 76 manuscripts. We omit the Stuttgart manuscript that was burned in 1870. It is striking how many of these manuscripts are found in libraries that are not known for their holdings of legal manuscripts. That fact may indicate that this treatise was regarded as useful to many people in the Middle Ages, and that they stuck it into any manuscript that happened to be at hand. Whether all of these items are, in fact, D’s treatise is questionable. Many of the catalogues on which Dolezalek relied seem to have been made before the parallel treatise, perhaps by Cinus, on the same topic was known. The mistaken attribution to Bartolus, which we find a number of times, is also well known. Be that as it may be, some of our examples clearly have additions and perhaps complete rewritings by others. We have three attributions of what seems to be D’s treatise to Johannes de Matiscone [c. 1355–1446 X 1448; see R. Feenstra, s.n. Mâcon, Jean de, in DHJF 685–686]. One manuscript [BAV, Vat. lat. 10726] has additiones ascribed to Franciscus [?de Barigianis, Perusinus; not in DGI]. Others [Firenze, Ashburnham 1798; Leipzig 1054] have evidence of reworking without saying who did it.

Basel, Universitätsbibl. F.II.13 (item 5)

t036Txt02aBerlin, Staatsbibl. Lat. fol. 174, fol. 5–8v (Only item in this manuscript that Dolezalek lists.)

Berlin, Staatsbibl. Lat. fol. 312, fol. 13r–17v

t036Txt02aBerlin, Staatsbibl. Magdeb. 63, fol. 196r–200v (Also Tractatus de contractu emptionis et venditionis, fol. 252r–256v.)

t036Txt02aBern, Burgerbibl. 18, fol. 177r–192v (Fragment. See also Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02aBruxelles/Brussel, Bibl. Royale II 1423, fol. 261v–263r (Probably D., here ascribed to Bartolus.)

t036Txt02aBruxelles/Brussel, Bibl. Royale II 1442, fol. 98r–101r (See also Glossae contrariae, sub ms. cit.)

Bruxelles/Brussel, Bibl. Royale II 3593 (item 1)

t036Txt02aCórdoba, Bibl. Cap. 12, fol. 47rb–50rb (Probably D., here ascribed to Bartolus.)

Córdoba, Bibl. Cap. 94, fol. 157vb–160va

Dillingen an der Donau, Studienbibl. XV. 93, fol. 235v–240v

Eichstätt, Universitätsbibl. 186, fol. 58r–59v

t036Txt02aErfurt, Universitätsbibl., Bibl. Amploniana CA 2° 227, fol. 8va–9va (See also Lectura, sub ms. cit.)

Erlangen, Universitätsbibl. 598, fol. 378r–380vb

t036Txt02aFirenze, Bibl. Laurenz. Ashburnham 1798, fol. 90v–93v (The beginning corresponds to what is found elsewhere for D’s treatise, but the ending does not.)

t036Txt02aGdańsk, Bibl. Gdańska Polskiej Akad. Nauk Mar. 2° 225, fol. 256–260 (Dolezalek confirms the holding from K. Aland, Handschriftenbestände der polnischen Bibliotheken [Berlin 1956].)

Greifswald, Bibl. des Geistlichen Ministeriums 18.C.I, fol. 120v–123

Grenoble, BM 58, fol. 336(–339)

Halle, Universitäts- u. Landesbibl. Ye 2° 14, fol. 130v–136r

t036Txt02aHalle, Universitäts- u. Landesbibl. Ye 4° 4, fol. 1r–8v (The item is attributed to Johannes de Matiscone, but the incipit matches D’s treatise, and the explicit is ‘et hoc secundum Dynum’. The colophon is dated x.1428; the name given there, Hinricus Jenevelt, is probably that of the scribe.)

t036Txt02aLeipzig, Universitätsbibl. 917, fol. 321v–324v (Probably D., here ascribed to Bartolus.)

t036Txt02aLeipzig, Universitätsbibl. 1054, fol. 215–218 (Dolezalek notes that the item has been reworked.)

t036Txt02aLeipzig, Universitätsbibl. Hänel 15, fol. 295r–298r (Also attributed to D.: Tractatus de substitutionibus, fol. 231v–234r; Tractatus de dictionibus, fol. 298r–299v.)

t036Txt02aLjubljana, NUK 152, fol. 269vb–272rb (Manuscript online. Also attributed to D.: Tractatus de quartis, fol. 267vb–269va.)

London, BL Arundel 489, fol. 166v–[168v]

t036Txt02aLondon, BL Arundel 493, fol. 20–[21] (Attribution based on the incipit.)

t036Txt02aLüneburg, Ratsbücherei Hist.C. 2° 45, fol. 119–124 (Sole item in manuscript.)

Madrid, BN 694, fol. 66–72v

t036Txt02aMainz, Stadtbibl. I.33 (Sole item in manuscript. Attributed to Johannes de Matiscone, but the incipit matches D’s treatise, and the explicit may so match.)

t036Txt02aMainz, Stadtbibl. II.232 (Only item that Dolezalek lists, but he says that it is the second item.)

Milano, Bibl. Ambrosiana (scaffali ‘infra’), H.172 inf., fol. 133–135

München, BSB clm. 231, fol. 116–[123]

München, BSB clm. 5459, fol. 246–[247]

t036Txt02aMünchen, BSB clm. 6573, fol. 139v–142 (Probably D., here ascribed to Bartolus.)

t036Txt02aMünchen, BSB clm. 7580, fol. 19r–22v (Also attributed to D: Definitiones terminorum iuridicorum (‘Expositiones’), fol. 34–[37].)

München, BSB clm. 8803, fol. 155r–157v

München, BSB clm. 12231, fol. 109rb–111va

t036Txt02aMünchen, BSB clm. 26669, fol. 97r–100v (Also attributed to D.: Definitiones terminorum iuridicorum (‘Expositiones’), fol. 113–{116]; Tractatus de praescriptionibus, fol. 177–[184].)

München, Universitätsbibl. 2° Cod.ms.249 (item 1)

t036Txt02aNew Haven, Conn., Yale Univ., Law Libr. Rare36 11–0214 (Hicks MssJ.C69 no.1), fol. 146–148 (Also attributed to D.: Tractatus de praescriptionibus, fol. 148–151.)

t036Txt02aPadova, Bibl. Univ. 1268, fol. 49r–52r (Also attributed to D.: Tractatus de quartis, fol. 53r–56r; Ordo iudiciorum, fol. 79r–82r.)

Padova, Bibl. Univ. MS al numero provvisorio 275, fol. 237r–242r

t036Txt02aParis, BN lat. 4557 (item 18) (Dolezalek notes that this manuscript is often incorreclty cited as lat. 4457.)

t036Txt02aParis, BN lat. 4591 (item 16) (Probably D., here ascribed to Bartolus.)

t036Txt02aPistoia, BC A. 65, fol. 360–361 (Sole item listed in manuscript. Dolezalek questions whether this item should be ascribed to D. or to Dinus de Pistorio, but the incipit and explicit look as is if it is D’s work.)

t036Txt02aPraha, Národní Muz. Dobrovská Knihovna MS a 5, fol. 505va–507vb (Dolezalek questions whether this item, here ascribed to Baldus, should be ascribed to D. or to Dinus de Pistorio, but the incipit and explicit look as is if it is D’s work. See further Glossae contrariae, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02aSaint-Diè-des-Vosges, BM 33 (Only item that Dolezalek lists, but he says that it is the second item.)

t036Txt02aSaint-Omer, BM 539, fol. 61r–65r (Dated in the colophon vii.1421.)

El Escorial, Bibl. San Lorenzo d.II.7, fol. 194v

t036Txt02aSankt Paul im Lavanttal, Stiftsbibl. 168/4 (item 5) (The shelfmark is one in the collection of paper manuscripts from Spital am Pyhrn. According to C. Glaßner’s inventory, the former shelfmark is 26.4.6, and that in Manscripta juridica, 26.14.6, is mistaken. Also, Glaßner lists it as the item 5 in the manuscript, rather than item 4.)

t036Txt02aSeu d’Urgell, Bibl. Cap. 2039, fol. 76rb–vb (More detail in García et al., 82.)

Sevilla, Bibl. Colombina 5–7–5, fol. Iva–IIIra

t036Txt02aSevilla, Bibl. Colombina 5–7–22 (Only item listed. Probably D., here ascribed to Bartolus.)

Strasbourg, BN et Universitaire 1036, fol. 236–239v

t036Txt02aStuttgart, Würtembergische Landesbibl. Cod. jur. 2° 127, fol. 97v–103v (Contains other Tractatus de successionibus ab intesto including one ascribed to Matthaeus de Matesilanis [Bononiensis; see A. Labardi, s.n. Mattesil(l) ani, Matteo, fl. 1398 X 1412, in DGI 2.1308 ] and another to Bartolus.)

Stuttgart, Würtembergische Landesbibl. theol. et phil. fol. 86 (item 1)

t036Txt02aStuttgart, Würtembergische Landesbibl. HB I 170 (Only item listed.)

Stuttgart, Würtembergische Landesbibl. HB VI 119, fol. 72r–77v

Toledo, Bibl. Catedral 20–20, fol. 141ra–142ra

t036Txt02aToledo, Bibl. Catedral 40–12, fol. 111rb–113va (Probably D., here ascribed to Bartolus.)

Trier, Stadtbibl. 743/1424, fol. 226r–228v

Trier, Stadtbibl. 975/923, fol. 78r–79r

Tübingen, Universitätsbibl. Mc 16, fol. 250v–252v

Tübingen, Universitätsbibl. Mc 16, fol. 137vb–143rb

Valenciennes, BM 281, fol. 250–252

t036Txt02aCittà del Vaticano, BAV Borgh. lat. 254, fol. 24v–25v (Attributed to Johannes de Matiscone. The incipit looks like D’s treatise; the explicit does not.)

t036Txt02aCittà del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 2638, fol. 1ra–3ra (Also attributed to D.: Tractatus de praescriptionibus, item 4 .)

t036Txt02aCittà del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 10726, fol. 164–167v (With additions of Franciscus de ?Barigianis [Perusinus] [not in DGI]. See further Quaestiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02aVerona, Bibl. Cap. CLXXIV –165–, fol. 37va–38rb (See further Repetitiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02aWien, ÖNB Cvpl. 5045, fol. 59v–62v (Also attributed to D.: Tractatus de quartis, fol. 57v–59v.)

Wien, ÖNB Cvpl. 5283, fol. 22r–26v

t036Txt02aWolfenbüttel, Herzog August Bibl. Cod. Guelf. 19.6. Aug. 2°, fol. 93r–96r (Not attributed in the manuscript.)

t036Txt02aWolfenbüttel, Herzog August Bibl. Cod. Guelf. 176 Helmst., fol. 42r–49 (Dolezalek queries whether it is D’s.)

t036Txt02aWrocław, Arch. . . . [ex Milich 46], fol. 231v–239r (The manuscript was in the Millich collection in Görlitz. It was transferred to the Wrocław archives, but we have had no better luck than Dolezalek at finding its current shelfmark.)

t036Txt02aZeitz, Domherrenbibl. 17, fol. 260r–265 (Only item in this manuscript that Dolezalek lists.)

De interesse.

t036Txt02bMadrid, BN 397, fol. 142vb–143va (The incipit suggests that this was thought of as a quaestio. See further Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02bCittà del Vaticano, BAV Borgh. lat. 274, fol. 128rb–129rb (The incipit suggests that this was thought of as a quaestio. See further Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

De praescriptionibus.

Augsburg, Staats- u. Stadtbibl. 2° 406, fol. 105

t036Txt02cMünchen, BSB clm. 26669, fol. 177–[184] (See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02cNew Haven, Conn., Yale Univ., Law Libr. Rare36 11–0214 (MssJ C69 no.1), fol. 148–151 (See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

Paris, BN lat. 4715, fol. 32r–39v

Tübingen, Universitätsbibl. Mc 12, fol. 293v–[298]

Città del Vaticano, BAV Ross. lat. 820 (item 2)

t036Txt02cCittà del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 10726, fol. 491–[496] (See further Quaestions, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02cCittà del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 11605, fol. 131v–134 (Probably D., here ascribed to Bartolus.)

t036Txt02cCittà del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 2638, fol. 7ra–9va (Ascribed to ‘Dy. de Nusello’. See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

De praesumptionibus.

t036Txt02dBerlin, Staatsbibl. Lat. fol. 171, fol. 123v–126v (The incipit is like that of a tractatus. See further Miscellaneous, De fideicommissis, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02dBerlin, Staatsbibl. Lat. fol. 305, fol. 213–215v (The incipit is like that of a tractatus.)

De quartis.

t036Txt02eLjubljana, NUK 152, fol. 267vb-269va (From the online copy: ‘Tractatus quartarum’. Incipit: Quartarum alia est debita iure nature. Explicit: ut C. quando et quibus quarta pars debetur l. j. Dynus de Mugello legum doctor. See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02ePadova, Bibl. Univ. 1268, fol. 53r-56r (The explicit suggests that this may be derived from a consilium. See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02eWien, ÖNB Cvpl. 5045, fol. 57v-59v (See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

De cumulatione actionum.

t036Txt02fMadrid, BN 920, fol. 213–218va (Here the issue is raised as a quaestio. See further Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02fCittà del Vaticano, BAV Borgh. lat. 274, fol. 126ra–127vb (See further Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

De vulgari et pupillari substitutione.

t036Txt02gHalle, Universitäts- u. Landesbibl. Ye 2° 68, fol. 435vb–438rb (Incipit differs from others.)

t036Txt02gLeipzig, Universitätsbibl. Hänel 15, fol. 231v–234r (See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

Madrid, Bibl. Acad. Historia Sección de códices y cartularios 975 B, fol. 295ra–va

t036Txt02gParis, BN n.a.l. 2436, fol. 152v (Incipit differs from others.)

t036Txt02gVerona, Bibl. Cap. CLXXIV –165–, fol. 31ra–32rb (See further Repetitiones, sub ms. cit.)

De primo et secundo decreto.

t036Txt02hCambridge, MA, Harvard Law HLS MS 75, fol. 261v–264v (Identification based on online copy and HOLLIS catalogue. See further Glossae contrariae, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02hOlomouc, Zemský archiv A3 C.O.201 (On the opening flyleaves. )

Wien, ÖNB Cvpl. 5121, fol. 169r–170v

De tormentis.

t036Txt02iFirenze, Bibl. Laurenz. Acquisti e doni 158.1, fol. 358v–359v (Tractatus de quaestionibus. In lower margin. The explicit suggests that this is consilium.)

t036Txt02iGraz, Universitätsbibl. 59, fol. 251–253 (Tractatus de quaestionibus et tormentis.)

t036Txt02iNürnberg, Stadtbibl. Cent.II.76, fol. 169ra–rb (Tractatus de quaestionibus. Also ascribed to D.: Tractatus de fama, fol. 168r–v.)

t036Txt02iPistoia, Arch. Cap. C.158 (?vel 154), fol. 172 (Tractatus de quaestionibus. Here ascribed to D. Dolezalek notes that it is also ascribed to Bartolus, Baldus, and Andreas Ciaffi. Incipit mentions torture.)

t036Txt02iRavenna, Bibl. Classense 374 vol. II, fol. 1–8v (Tractatus de tormentis. Here ascribed to D. Dolezalek notes that it is often ascribed to Bartolus. This part of the manuscript is dated to the first half of the 16th century.)

t036Txt02iStuttgart, Würtembergische Landesbibl. Cod. jur. 2° 123, fol. 43va–47va (Tractatus de quaestionibus. Dolezalek notes that this item also ascribed to Bartolus and Albertus Gandinus. Also ascribed to D.: Tractatus de dictionibus compositis, fol. 49ra–51rb.)

t036Txt02iTübingen, Universitätsbibl. Mc 60, fol. 149–151v (Tractatus de quaestionibus. Breaks off in the middle. Dolezalek notes that it is also ascribed to Bartolus and Andreas Ciaffi.)

De modis arguendi.

t036Txt02jFirenze, BN II.I.64 (item 4) (A source of Caprioli’s ed.)

t036Txt02jCittà del Vaticano, BAV Ott. lat. 1299, fol. 56v (Excerpta. Dolezalek notes that this item is based on the same text as that which appears in BAV, Vat. lat. 9428. It contains canonistic citations. Used by Caprioli in his edition.)

t036Txt02jCittà del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 9428, fol. 349v–350r (Dolezalek notes that this item was taken in part from the excerpts in BAV, Ott. lat. 1299, and in part from an older work. Caprioli’s ed. relies on it.)

Ordo iudiciarius.

Bologna, Coll. Spagna 126 (item 9)

t036Txt02kCambridge, MA, Harvard Law HLS MS 75, fol. 252r–256v (Catalogued as: Dynus, Carmen de iudiciis, cum commentario. See further Glossae contrariae, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02kLuxembourg, BN 228, fol. 60r–7lv (Catlogued as Ordo iudiciorum metricus. Incomplete.)

t036Txt02kPadova, Bibl. Univ. 1268, fol.79r–82r (See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

Siena, BC H.V.33 (item 4)

t036Txt02kStuttgart, Würtembergische Landesbibl. HB VI 45 (item 12) (Used in Wahrmund’s ed.)

Miscellaneous.

This list is arranged by the titles in Manuscripta juridica.

t036Txt02lKraków, Bibl. Jagiellońska 412, fol. 281–282 (‘Florilegium legum. Excerpta collecta ex Corpore iuris civilis, per Dynum et Johannem de Imola’. See further Vocabularies, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02lMadrid, BN 28, fol. [59rb]–60vb (Tractatus de alimentis. The incipit makes it likely that this is an extract from an additio or a lectura.)

t036Txt02lWashington, D.C., LC Law I.74, fol. 2ra (Tractatus de causa legis condendae. The incipit suggests that this was a quaestio.)

t036Txt02lBerlin, Staatsbibl. Lat. fol. 171, fol. 123v–126v (Tractatus de cessione iurium. This title is found in the two Berlin manuscripts listed here; in Olomouc, Zemský archiv C.O.40, fol. 128r–129r, unattributed, and in Stuttgart, Würtembergische Landesbibl. Cod. jur. 2° 123, fol. 19ra–22rb, where it is called De cessione iurium et actionum and is attributed to Jacobus de Arena. The incipits of the two Berlin manuscripts are the same: Quoniam materia de cessione [and then:] iurium utilis est et nonnullis incognita. Those of the other two manuscripts are very different from the Berlin manuscripts and each other. All four may have developed from thinking about the materia of Dig. 42.4. See further below De fideicommissis, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02lBerlin, Staatsbibl. Lat. fol. 305, fol. 213–215v (Tractatus de cessione iurium. See previous item.)

t036Txt02lBern, Burgerbibl. 18, fol. 168v (Tractatus de cognatis et agnatis. Fragment, perhaps derived from De successionibus. See further Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02lWürzburg, Universitätsbibl. M.ch.f.135, fol. 168v–176 (Tractatus de contractibus. Sole item listed in manuscript.)

t036Txt02lBerlin, Staatsbibl. Magdeb. 63, fol. 252r–256v (Tractatus de contractu emptionis et venditionis. See further De successionibus, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02lFirenze, Bibl. Laurenz. Santa Croce Plut. 5 sin. 12, fol. 47 (Tractatus de excussione pignorum. Dolezalek notes that this item is attributed elsewhere to Bartolus or Jacobus de Arena.)

t036Txt02lNürnberg, Stadtbibl. Cent.II.76, fol. 168r–v (Tractatus de fama. The incipit is the same as that of the well-known treatise with the same title by Thomas de Piperata. See further De quaestionibus, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02lBerlin, Staatsbibl. Lat. fol. 171, fol. 126v–133r (Tractatus de fideicommissis. The incipit is more like that of a tractatus. See further above De cessione iurium, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02lKlagenfurt, Bischöfliche Bibl. XXIX a.10 (item 8) (Tractatus de hypothecaria actione. The incipit is more like that of a lectura. See further Quaestiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt02lBerlin, Staatsbibl. Lat. fol. 865, fol. 34v–35v (Tractatus de percussionibus ex quibus quis moritur ex interuallo. Ascribed to D. in the rubric. Dolezalek ascribes to Odofredus. The incipit is more like that of an additio or a lectura.)

t036Txt02lLyon, BM 387, fol. 64v–65v (Tractatus de praesumptionibus. Ascribed in the catalogue to Bartolus, but ascribed to D. on fol. 60r.)

t036Txt02lTübingen, Universitätsbibl. Mc 12 (Tractatus de testibus. Manuscript ascribes to D. and to Johannes Andreae in two different hands. The incipit suggests that it is derived from some prose ordo iudiciarius. See further De praescriptionibus, sub ms. cit.)

Consilia and quaestiones.

This list is the product of two searches in Manuscripta juridica, one for ‘Dinus AND Quaesti’, the other for a ‘Dinus AND ‘Consil’. Hence, the locations of the manuscripts run through the alphabet twice.

t036Txt03Firenze, Bibl. Laurenz. Santa Croce Plut. 8 sin. 1 (Sole item in manuscript described as ‘quaestio disputata in civitate Senarum anno primo studii generalis’ by Dinus de Florentia magister. D. is not not normally described as ‘Dinus de Florentia’. This may be another Dinus. See Bargioni, 8–9.)

t036Txt03Huesca, Arch. Catedral 61 (Ascribed to D. are: Quaestio ad D.39.4.15, fol. 15r [not in Lyon 1513]; Repetitio ad D.39.5.2, fol. 15v–16r; Quaestio ad D.41.2.3, fol. 53v–54r; Quaestio ad D.42.2.3.10, fol. 54r [longer than in Lyon 1513].)

t036Txt03Klagenfurt, Bischöfliche Bibl. XXIX a.10 (Ascribed to D.: Tractatus de hypothecaria actione, 75va–77rb. Ascribed to D. and others: Quaestiones, fol. 79ra–88vb.)

t036Txt03Kaliningrad, Universitätsbibl. 170 (Dolezalek queries whether this manuscript may now be in Toruń, Biblioteka Uniwersytecka. Ascribed to D. and others: Quaestiones, fol. 273r–274v.)

t036Txt03Madrid, BN 920 (For a quaestio ascribed to Azo and D., see Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt03Monte Cassino, Bibl. Abbazia 122, Plut.XX (Ascribed to D. and others: Quaestiones, pag. 1a–140a. See Meijers, Interpretes.)

t036Txt03München, BSB clm. 28178 (A collection of 65 items. Ascribed to D. are: Commentum ad C.1.3.54, fol. 12r; Quaestio de facto ad C.3.28.33.1, fol. 59va; a long Quaestio de facto ad C.3.28, fol. 59vb–60vb; Solutiones contrariorum ad C.5.9.6, fol. 103v; Distinctio ad C.6.20, fol. 137v; Commentum ad C.6.25.10, fol. 139va–140vb.)

t036Txt03München, BSB clm. 3508 (Ascribed to D.: Quaestio de facto ad D.50.4.6.4, fol. 74rb.)

t036Txt03Olomouc, Zemský archiv C.O.40 (Ascribed to D. and others: Quaestiones, fol. 78v–82r, 126r–127v, 140v–154r, 160r–171r, 171v–173r.)

t036Txt03Roma, Bibl. Angelica 275 (Quaestio de rebus traditis per sponsum sponsae, fol. 176v–177a.)

t036Txt03Seu d’Urgell, Bibl. Cap. 2088 (Ascribed to D.: Quaestiones [legitimae] super Digesto novo [D 39.1.1–39.5.20 and D.43.17.1], fol. 1ra–8vb; Lectura vel additiones super Digest novo, fol. 9r–18ra and 9ra–51ra; Quaestiones super Infortiato, fol. 53ra–60va; Additiones super Infortiato, fol. 61ra–94rb. See García, et al., Catálogo 205–207, for an analysis critical of previous ones and arguing that these items are substantially different from what appears under the same name in ed. Lyon 1513 and in other manuscripts.)

t036Txt03Tarazona, Bibl. Catedral 18 (Ascribed to D.: Quaestiones de facto ad Infortiatum, fol. 14ra–20vb. Cf. under Additiones, BAV, Borgh. lat. 274, fol. 78v–95r.)

t036Txt03Città del Vaticano, BAV Arch.S.Pietro A.29 (Ascribed to D. among many others: Quaestiones, consilia, tractatus, fol. 32–347.)

t036Txt03Città del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 10726 (A collection of 96 short items. Ascribed to D. are: Tractatus de successionibus ab intestato with additions of Franciscus de ?Barigianis [Perusinus], fol. 164–167v; a quaestio [item 48]. Ascribed to D. and many others: Quaestiones, fol. 36–58, 59v, 60v. The Concordantia glossarum contrariarum iuris civilis, fol. 474–[480], is here ascribed to Bartolus, but it is probably D’s.)

t036Txt03Città del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 1422 (Ascribed to D. and others: Quaestiones legitimae (= Quare), fol. i–iii (flyleaves). For other items ascribed to D. in this manuscript, see Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt03Città del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 6935 (A collection of 40 short items, mostly quaestiones. Ascribed to D. are: Quaestio de facto ad D.35.1.72.4, fol. 19ra–vb [n.4]; Quaestio de facto ad D.45.1.138, fol. 19ra–vb (n.6); an unspecified quaestio, fol. 19ra–vb [n.7].)

t036Txt03Venezia, BN Lat. Z. 182 (1618 = Valentinelli v. 2 p. 259) (Ascribed to D. and others: Quaestiones [entire manuscript].)

t036Txt03Bologna, Bibl. Univ. 1867 (Ascribed to D. and Marsilius de Mantighellis: Consilia [nos. 14, 16].)

t036Txt03Bologna, Coll. Spagna 121 (Ascribed to D. among many others: Consilia, fol. 1–35.)

t036Txt03Firenze, BN Panciatichi 138 (Ascribed to D.: Consilium De successionibus ab intestato, fol. 191r–193r [probably the same as the treatise of the same name].)

t036Txt03Foligno, Bibl. Seminario Jacobilii 123 (Ascribed to D. among many others: Consilia, fol. 19r–43r.)

t036Txt03Leipzig, Universitätsbibl. 1054 (Ascribed to D.: Tractatus de successionibus ab intestato, fol. 215–218. Ascribed to D. among many others: Consilia, fol. 262v–[274].)

t036Txt03Lyon, BM 387 (Ascribed to D. among many others: Consilia, fol. 121–[151])

t036Txt03Pisa, Bibl. Univ. 701 (Ascribed to D. among many others: Consilia [entire manuscript].)

t036Txt03Ravenna, Bibl. Classense 485 (Ascribed to D. among many others: Consilia [item 6].)

t036Txt03Città del Vaticano, BAV Borgh. lat. 274 (For consilia ascribed to D. in this manuscript, see Additiones, sub ms. cit.)

t036Txt03Città del Vaticano, BAV Urb. lat. 1132 (Ascribed to D. among many others: Consilia [item 1].)

t036Txt03Città del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 2656 (Ascribed to D.: Consilia, fol. 28ra–40va [approximately 44]; Glossae contrariae, fol. 45r–49v.)

t036Txt03Città del Vaticano, BAV Vat. lat. 8069 (Ascribed to D. among many others: Consilia [item 5].)

t036Txt03Venezia, BN Lat. V.2 (2324 = Valentinelli v. 3 p. 39) (Ascribed to D. among many others: Consilia [item 2].)

t036Txt03Venezia, BN Lat. Z. 208 (1622 = Valentinelli v. 3 p. 11) (Ascribed to D.: Consilium de pecunia Lambertatiorum et Gebellinorum Bononia expulsorum per commune, fol. 86–87.)

Note.

We mention here, because of the uncertainty as to what it is, Singularia doctorum (Lyon 1570), fol. 2.130r–135r (online), (Frankfurt: Wechelus, 1596), fol. 2.234–242 (online): very brief statements by D. of a legal principle with a citation, mixed in with similar statements by Rainerius de Forlivio, without identification as to which author wrote which, 275 statements in all. The title of the collection suggests that the extracts may be drawn from D’s Glossae contrariae and the similar work by Rainerius. Our focus in what follows is on incunablula and on later prints of items that are rare. References to online copies are given only selectively. Many more for the incunabula will be found in GW.

De regulis iuris.

The number of printed editions of this title exceeds previous estimates. GW lists 18 incunabula; WorldCat has 80 up to 1617 (though some of these are duplicates). We list here the incunabula and a couple of later editions.

De regulis iuris. Roma: Adam Rot, 16.ix.1472 (GW 8354).

De regulis iuris. Angers: Johannes de Turre, c. 1476 (GW 0835410N).

De regulis iuris. Roma: apud S. Marcum (Vitus Puecher), 28.xi.1476 (GW 8355).

De regulis iuris. Toulouse: Heinrich Turner and Johann Parix, c. 1476/77 (GW 8356).

De regulis iuris. Milano: Johannes Antonius and Benignus de Honate for Petrus Antonius de Castelliono, 18.iii.1479 (GW 8357).

De regulis iuris (Dinus de Mugello). Also: Arbor omnium actionum (Johannes Andreae and Johannes Crispus de Montibus). Venezia: n.e., 1480 (GW 7 Sp.422a).

De regulis iuris. Venezia: Andreas de Bonetis, 10.vi.1484 (GW 8358).

De regulis iuris. Venezia: Johannes de Gregoriis, 25.iv.1486 (GW 8359).

De regulis iuris. Venezia: Baptista de Tortis, 10.iii.1489 (GW 8360).

De regulis iuris etc. Pescia: [printer of Canaro type for] Bastianus and Raphael Orlandis, 24.iii.1492 (GW 8361).

De regulis iuris. Venezia: Bernardinus Stagninus, 26.x.1495 (GW 8362).

De regulis iuris, ed. Petrus Caponi. Paris: Antoine Caillaut, [c. 1497] (GW 8363).

De regulis iuris, ed. Petrus Caponi, rev. Roger Barme. [Paris]: Félix Baligault [for Jean Petit], [c. 1498] (GW 8364).

De regulis iuris. Pavia: Franciscus Girardengus, 16.ii.1498 (GW 8365).

De regulis iuris. Venezia: Baptista de Tortis, 10.iii.1498 (GW 8366).

De regulis iuris, ed. Petrus Caponi, rev. Roger Barme. Paris: Georg Mittelhus, 21.vii.1498 (GW 8367).

De regulis iuris. Paris: [for] Durand Gerlier and Jean Petit, 20.xii.1500 (GW 0836710N).

De regulis iuris, ed. Nicolaus Boerius. s.l.: s.e., [p. 1500] (GW 7 Sp.425a). WorldCat has a number of examples of the edition by Nicolas de Bohier, starting with Lyon 1516 and Pavia 1518. A copy s.l. c. 1520 is available online.

De regulis iuris, ed. Thomas Diplovatatius. Venezia: Philippus Pincius Mantuanus, 1518. Does not seem to be available online. For confirmation that this is the Diplovatatius ed., see A. Mazzacane, s.n. Tomasso Diplovatazio, in DBI 40.249–254 (online).

De actionibus.

De actionibus (Inst. IV,6). Lectura super Ioannis Bassiani arbore actione[um]. Bologna: Johann Valbeck and Bartholomäus von Utrecht, 24.iii.1495 (GW 8349).

De actionibus (Inst. IV,6). Lectura super Ioannis Bassiani arbore action[um]. De interesse. [Milano]: Ulrich Scinzenzeller, c. 1496/97] (GW 8350) (online).

De actionibus (Inst. IV,6) etc. Venezia: Bernardinus Stagninus, 12.ii.1498 (GW 8351). De interesse is tucked in at the end without indication of authorship in the incipit, though the colophon seems to ascribe it to D.

De actionibus (Inst. IV,6) etc. Venezia: Sumptibus d[omi]ni Benedicti Fontana. p[er] Philippum Pincium, 1505.

De actionibus (Inst. IV,6) etc. Milano: Giovanni Antonio or Giovanni Giacomo da Legnano, 1521.

De actionibus (Inst. IV,6) etc. Lyon: Apud haeredes Iacobi Iunctae, 1567.

De actionibus (Inst. IV,6) etc. Frankfurt: per Georgium Coruinum, impensis Hieronymi Feyerabent, 1569.

Additiones.

Some of D’s additiones can be found in early printed editions of the entire Corpus iuris civilis, e.g. François Fradin’s, 6 vols., Lyon 1509, and reprinted in successive years (the 1514 ed. of the Infortiatum is online; see fol. 3va for the reference to D.). The most convenient edition of D’s additiones to the Infortiatum and the Digestum novum is that of Lyon 1513.

Dinus de Muxello [sic]: Super infortiato et digesto novo. Lyon: Jacob Myt, 1513 (online). Reprinted in Opera iuridica rariora 17, Bologna 1971. The work is small in size, but it contains 199 unnumbered fols. with fairly extensive marginal glosses by Celsus Hugo Dissutus for whom see DHJF, s.n. Descousu, Celse-Hugues.

Utilis ac fecu[n]da lectura Domini Raynerij de Forliuio . . . super prima & secunda parte .ff. noui . . . cu[m] eiusdem Raynerij: dyni: pluriumq[ue] alior[um] doctor[um] additionibus in margine libri collocatis. Lyon: Vincent de Portionariis, 1523. We include this example of many early prints that contain D’s additiones because the title page adds: ‘In cuius calce additur acuta domini Dyni Repetitio super § si plures’. There are many §§ si plures in the Digestum novum (e.g., Dig.39.2.5.1; Dig.39.2.15.15; Dig.39.2.40.4). Unfortunately, there does not seem to be a copy of this print online, which might allow one to determine whether this is really a repetitio and what it is about.

Glossae contrariae.

See also Singularia doctorum, cited at the beginning of this section.

Tractatus plurimorum doctorum: Glosse contrarie secundum Dynum. Lyon: Symon Vincentius, 1519, 101ra–103vb (online).

Tractatus: De glossis contrariis. Lyon: [Compagnie des libraires], 1549, 1.206rb-206vb (online). This ed. does not seem to be as complete as that of Lyon 1519.

Tractatus universi iuris: De glossis contrariis. Venezia: F. Ziletti, 1584, 18.187ra (online). This ed., like that of Tractatus Lyon 1549, does not seem to be as complete as that of Lyon 1519.

Tractatus.

The print history of D’s tractatus is curious. De successionibus and De interesse have a number of examples. De praescriptionibus appears early and often. There is at least one example of De modis arguendi and of De primo et secundo decreto. We have not found any of the others listed in Texts. That does not mean that printed examples of them do not exist. As noted in Texts, Savigny reports two prints of De praesumptionibus that we could not find. Not all of the 16th-century printings of short works with multiple authors have been fully analyzed. Such prints of D’s works, however, if they exist, are likely to be rare.

De successionibus ab intestato.

Tractatus plurimorum doctorum: Dinus de Mugello: Tractatus successionum. Lyon: Symon Vincentius, 1519, 82ra–85vb (online).

Tractatus: Tractatus authenicus De successionibus ab intestato Domini Dyni Mugellani. Lyon: [Compagnie des libraires], 1549, 7.236vb–238ra (online).

Selecti tractatus iuris varij, vere aurei, de successione: Tractatus authenticus de successionibus ab intestato, d. Dyni Mugellani. Venezia: [Al segno della Concordia], 1580.

Tractatus universi iuris. Venezia: F. Ziletti, 1584, 8.1.318ra.

De interesse.

De actionibus (Inst. IV,6). Lectura super Ioannis Bassiani arbore action[um]. De interesse: De interesse. [Milano]: Ulrich Scinzenzeller, c. 1496/97], [21rb–21vb] (GW 8350) (online). De interesse is tucked in at the end without indication of authorship in the incipit, though the colophon seems to ascribe it to D.

Tractatus: De interesse D. Dyni Mugellani. Lyon: [Compagnie des libraires], 1549, 8.242rb (online).

Tractatus universi iuris. Venezia: F. Ziletti, 1584, 5.6vb.

De praescriptionibus.

Tractatus plurimi iuris. Modus legendi abbreviaturas. Speyer: Peter Drach, sr., [c. 1477] (GW M47339).

Tractatus plurimi iuris. [Strassbourg]: [printer with peculiar ‘R’ (Adolf Rusch)], [not p. 1477] (GW M47359).

Tractatus plurimi iuris. Speyer: Peter Drach, jr., [not p. 1484] (GW M47341).

De praescriptionibus. Poitiers: Jean Bouyer, [c. 1486] (GW 8353).

Tractatus plurimi iuris. Modus legendi abbreviaturas: Dinus de Mugello: De praescriptionibus (Notabiliter collige quod prescriptiones . . . ). Basel: Michael Wenssler, [c. 1483–1486] (GW M24948).

Baldus: De quaestionibus: Dinus de Mugello: De praescriptionibus. Paris: Jean Bonhomme, 1486 (GW M47346) (online).

Tractatus plurimi iuris. Strassbourg: [printer of Jordanus von Quedlinburg], 26.ii.1488 (GW M47346).

Tractatus plurimi iuris. Strassbourg: [printer of Jordanus von Quedlinburg], 9.viii.1490 (GW M47350).

Goffredus de Trano: Summa super titulos decretalium etum: Dinus de Mugello: De praescriptionibus (Notabiliter collige quod prescriptiones . . . ). Venezia: Bernardinus Stagninus, 1491 (GW 10951) (online).

Caccialupis, Johannes Baptista de: De ludo etc.: Dinus de Mugello: De materia praescriptionum (Praescriptionum in unum collectas . . .). Urbino: Heinrich von Köln, x.1493 (GW 5839).

Tractatus plurimi iuris. Nürnberg: Anton Koberger, 23.vi.1494 (GW M47335).

Tractatus plurimi iuris. Strassbourg: printer of Jordanus von Quedlinburg, 21.vii.1494 (GW M47352).

Johannes Cisterciensis: Defensori[um] iuris etc: Dinus de Mugello: De praescriptionibus. Bologna: Ugo Rugerius, 18.iii.1499 (GW M13387).

Tractatus plurimi iuris. Strassbourg: [printer of Jordanus von Quedlinburg], 20 and 30.viii.1499 (GW M47364).

De praescriptionibus: quae tum iure ciuili, tum pontificio continentur tractatus: Dyni Mugellani. Venezia: Giunta, 1567. An online copy is available by subcription on Wiley Digital Archives.

De praescriptionibus: quae tum iure ciuili, tum pontificio continentur tractatus: Dyni Mugellani. Köln: Apud Ioannem Birckmannum & Theodorum Baumium, 1568.

De primo et secundo decreto.

Caccialupis, Johannes Baptista de: De advocatis etc.: Dinus de Mugello: De primo et seundo decreto. [Siena]: [?Heinrich von Köln], [c. 1500], [7r–8ra] (GW 5835) (online).

De modis arguendi.

Tractatus plurimorum doctorum: Modus arguendi secundum eundem Dynum. Lyon: Symon Vincentius, 1519, 104ra–104vb (online).

Consilia and quaestiones.

Consilia, ed. Franciscus de Accoltis. [Pisa]: s.e., s.d. (GW 0835110N).

Consilia, ed. Franciscus de Accoltis. Milano: Ulrich Scinzenzeller for Johannes de Legnano, vi.1496 (GW 8352).

Consilia, ed. Franciscus de Accoltis. Venezia: Baptista de Tortis, 1496 (GW 7 Sp.420a).

Consilia. Venezia: Sumptibus D[omi]ni Benedicti Fontana nouiter per Philippu[m] Pincium, Mantuanum, 1505 (online).

Consilia. Venezia: Giunta, 1551 (online). 53 consilia.

Consilia. Venezia: Apud Altobellum Salicatium, 1574 (online).

De modis arguendi.

Ed. S. Caprioli in ‘De modis arguendi scripta rariora I. Dini opusculum’, Studi senesi, ser. 3, 12 (1963) 230–253. Reprinted in: idem, Modi arguendi: testi per lo studio della retorica nel sistema del diritto comune (Testi, studi, strumenti 19; Spoleto 2006) 39–52.

Ordo iudiciarius.

Quellen zur Geschichte des römisch-kanonischen Processes im Mittelalter, ed. L. Wahrmund, 2.1 Anhang (1913).

(For a fuller bibliography, see A. Padovani in DGI, and Lange/Kriechbaum, Kommenatoren.)

J. Hernanz Pilar, ‘Dino del Mugello’, in Juristas universales 1.488–489.

A. Padovani, ‘Dino Rossoni del Mugello’, in DGI 1.769–771.

A. García y García and others, Catálogo de los manuscritos jurídicos de la Biblioteca Capitular de la Seu d’Urgell, ed. M. Bertram and P. Maffei (La Seu d’Urgell 2009).

M. Bellomo, Quaestiones in iure civili disputatae. Didattica e prassi colta nel sistema del diritto comune fra Duecento e Trecento (Roma 2008) 137, 394, 519, 558.

H. Lange and M. Kriechbaum, Kommentatoren 445–461.

G. Colli, Per una bibliografia dei trattati giuridici pubblicati nel XVI secolo, 2 vols. (Ius nostrum 20 and 28; Roma 1994–2003) 1.45, 214; 2.192–193.

M. Semeraro, Osberto da Cremona. Un giurista dell’età del diritto comune (Ius nostrum 25; Roma 2000) 37–44.

C. Valsecchi, Oldrado da Ponte e i suoi consilia. Un’auctoritas del prima Trecento (Milano 2000) 9, 24, 146 n., 149, 689.

F. Mancuso, Exprimere causam in sententia: ricerche sul principio di motivazione della sentenza nell’età del diritto comune classico (Milano 1999) 65–88.

E. Cortese, Il rinascimento giuridico medievale, 2d ed. (Roma 1996) 58–60.

G. Speciale, La memoria del diritto comune. Sulle tracce d’uso del Codex di Giustiniano (secoli XII-XV) (Roma 1994). (See index, s.n.)

A. Padovani, ‘The “Additiones et Apostillae super Secunda Parte Infortiati” of Cinus de Pistoia’, in The Two Laws. Studies in Medieval Legal History Dedicated to Stephan Kuttner, L. Mayali and S. Tibbets, ed. (Studies in Medieval and Early Modern Canon Law 1; Washington, D.C. 1990) 152–165.

P. Weimar, in LMA (1986) 3.1068–1069.

A. Padovani, Studi storici sulla dottrina delle sostituzioni (Milano 1983) 163–166.

D. Maffei, Giuristi medievali e falsificazioni editoriali del primo Cinquecento: Iacopo di Belviso in Provenza? (Ius Commune, Sonderhefte 10; Frankfurt am Main 1979) 31–32 n. 72, 51.

A. Padovani, ‘Le Additiones e apostilae super prima parte Infortiati di Cino da Pistoia’, SDHI, 45 (1979) 183.

E. Cortese, ‘Nicolaus de Ursone de Salerno. Un’opera ignota sulle lettere arbitrarie angioine nella tradizione dei trattati sulla tortura’, in Per Francesco Calasso: studi degli allievi (Roma 1978) 225–231, 234. Reprinted in: idem, Scritti 2 vols., I. Birocchi and U. Petronio, ed. (Collectanea 10; Spoleto 1999) 353–359, 362.

P. Peruzzi, ‘Angelus de Amelia, decretorum doctor, qui fuit tempore Bartoli (1307 ca.–1366 ca.)’, Studi urbinati, 44 (1975–1976) 38–49.

M. Bellomo, ‘Glossae contrariae di Cino da Pistoia’, TRG, 38 (1970) 433–447.

Thomas Diplovatatius, Liber de claris iurisconsultis, ed. F. Schulz and H. Kantorowicz (SG 10; Bologna 1968) 195–200. (Edited from a mid-16th century manuscript of a lost original of 1511.)

R. Davidsohn, Storia di Firenze, 4 in 8 vols. (Classici della storia moderna; 1956–1968) 2.1.456. (Italian translation of idem, Geschichte von Florenz [Berlin 1896–1927] [online].)

E. Cortese, La norma giuridica: Spunti teorici nel diritto comune classico, 2 vols. (Milano 1962–1964). (See index, s.n.)

S. Caprioli, ‘De modis arguendi scripta rariora I. Dini opusculum’, Studi senesi, ser. 3, 12 (1963) 230–253. Reprinted in: idem, Modi arguendi: testi per lo studio della retorica nel sistema del diritto comune (Testi, studi, strumenti 19; Spoleto 2006) 39–52.

D. Maffei, La Lectura super Digesto veteri di Cino da Pistoiia. Studio sui mss. Savigny 22 e Urb. Lat. 172 (Milano 1963) 24–26.

S. Caprioli, ‘Tre capitoli intorno alla nozione di regula iuris nel pensiero dei glossatori’, ASD, 5–6 (1961–1962) 221–374.

E. Meijers, ‘L’université d’Orléans au XIII siècle’, in Études d’histoire du droit, R. Feenstra and H. Fischer, ed. (Leiden 1959) 3.56, 118. (French translation of a work originally published as ‘De Universiteit van Orleans in de XIIIe euw’ in TRG 1 [1918–1919] and TRG 2 [1920–1921].)

P. Fiorelli, La tortura giusiziaria nel diritto comune, 2 vols. (1953–1954) 1.131–145.

M. D’Alatri, ‘L’inquisizione francescana nell’Italia centrale nel sec. XIII’, Collectanea Franciscana, 22–23 (1952–1953) 157–158.

L. Falletti, in DDC (1949) 4.1250–1257.

G. M. Monti, Da Carlo I a Roberto di Angiò (Trani 1936) 230, 233.

E. Meijers, Iuris Interpretes saec. XIII (Napoli 1924) p. xxxiii–xxxix. Reprinted in: idem, Études d’histoire du droit, R. Feenstra and H.F.W.D. Fischer, ed. (Leiden 1959), 3.162–166. (Title in reprint is ‘L’Unversità di Napoli·nel secolo XIII’.)

L. Chiappelli, ‘Maestri e Scuole in Pistoia fino al sec XIV’, Archivio storico italiano, 78.2 (1920) 186–190.

R. Bargioni, Dino da Mugello, giureconsulto del sec. XIII (Firenze 1920) (online).

M. Sarti and M. Fattorini, De claris archigymnasii Bononiensis professoribus a saeculo XI usque ad saeculum XIV, 2 vols. (Bologna 1888–1896) 1.254–262 (online). (1st ed. Bologna 1769.)

F. von Savigny, Geschichte 5.447–464 (online).